- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 02 May 2012 19:45:25 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15595
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |ian@hixie.ch
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <ian@hixie.ch> 2012-05-02 19:45:25 UTC ---
> Comment:
> The abstract could be improved by pointing out that "WebSocket protocol" is
> defined by the IETF, while this API specifies the browser API to use that
> protocol.
Done by adding a parenthetical regarding the source of the protocol. (When the
abstract was written, the protocol was part of the same spec, IIRC.)
> "The send(data) method transmits data using the connection. If the readyState
> attribute is CONNECTING, it must throw an InvalidStateError exception." - What
> happens for the other non-OPEN states?
The very next sentence in the spec answers that already.
> "unpaired surrogates" is mentioned in three places, but not defined anywhere.
I've changed this to not use a term of art but (it talks about surrogates that
are isolated, now), and added a reference to [UNICODE].
> In the same context, "with prejudice" is mentioned multiple
> times, only referencing the WebSockets protocol (instead of defining that),
> but the protocol doesn't mention that term.
The term "with prejudice" is defined at the target of the cross-reference; it
controls what events are fired in certain cases.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 19:45:28 UTC