- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:45:12 -0700
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- CC: ext Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, Peter Linss <peter.linss@hp.com>, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 06/18/2012 04:09 AM, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 5/30/12 10:38 AM, ext Daniel Glazman wrote: >> Le 30/05/12 14:43, Arthur Barstow a écrit : >> >>> Chris, Daniel, Peter - when will the CSS WG make a decision on the FPWD? >> >> We'll try to make one today during our weekly conf-call. Please note >> that we're going to review the bits of this document falling under CSS >> WG's wings. In particular section 6. Peter and I already have discovered >> a few things : >> >> 1. "position: center" in section 6.1 refers to an Editor's Draft that is >> not actively discussed at this time. Only normative references >> should be made to CSS specs or the Fullscreen draft will have to wait >> until that ED becomes a REC to itself become a REC. >> >> 2. the ::backdrop pseudo-element is not explained in the document >> outside of section 6.2. It's unclear to me why it is needed, what >> it represents, etc. >> >> 3. the parenthesis in section 6.2 seems to me to contain a copy/paste >> error "above the element below the element" >> >> 4. "layer" and "layer 10" in section 6.1 are unclear. "Layer" is used >> nowhere in CSS references used in this spec. This must be clarified. > > Does the latest ED <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/fullscreen/raw-file/tip/Overview.html> address the above concerns? It looks like you missed #2. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 18 June 2012 23:45:59 UTC