- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:25:56 -0700
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- Cc: Clint Hill <clint.hill@gmail.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>, Kornel LesiĆski <kornel@geekhood.net>
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com> wrote: > Since <template> is a very specialized thing then (inert, boundaries > and all that), and what some people are referring to as templating > (that is, string based stuff that may or may not represent DOM, but is > almost certainly not "pure DOM") is not the intent (IE, we should use > <script> for the cases discussed instead)... Does it make sense for > the API to potentially reflect that and the draft to note it? For > example... could it either not have an innerHTML property or could > that innerHTML return (empty string) or something? Noting it might be useful, but shutting off .innerHTML doesn't make sense. It's still a DOM element, and contains HTML. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 26 April 2012 18:26:45 UTC