- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:16:14 -0400
- To: Glenn Maynard <glenn@zewt.org>
- CC: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 4/11/12 4:06 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote: > It's a bit worse than that, actually: if you want to send only part of a > buffer, you have to create a whole new ArrayBuffer and copy the data > over. If you just pass "view.buffer", you'll send the *whole* > underlying buffer, not just the slice represented by the view. Oh, that's just broken. That argues for the removal of the ArrayBuffer overload, indeed, and just leaving the ArrayBufferView version. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:16:44 UTC