On 4/11/12 4:06 PM, Glenn Maynard wrote: > It's a bit worse than that, actually: if you want to send only part of a > buffer, you have to create a whole new ArrayBuffer and copy the data > over. If you just pass "view.buffer", you'll send the *whole* > underlying buffer, not just the slice represented by the view. Oh, that's just broken. That argues for the removal of the ArrayBuffer overload, indeed, and just leaving the ArrayBufferView version. -BorisReceived on Wednesday, 11 April 2012 20:16:44 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:33 UTC