W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > April to June 2012

Bikesheds Re: [selectors-api] Consider backporting find() behavior to querySelector()

From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 12:54:36 +0200
To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Elliott Sprehn" <esprehn@gmail.com>, "Simon Pieters" <simonp@opera.com>, "Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu" <kennyluck@csail.mit.edu>, "public-webapps.w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.wf81xarjwxe0ny@widsith-3.local>
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:26:14 +0200, Lachlan Hunt  
<lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au> wrote:

> On 2012-06-20 10:42, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>> In other words we have the same arguments that we had five years ago,
>> when we settled on querySelector as the one that provoked least  
>> objection.
>> ...
>> But spending another few months arguing about it hasn't proven that we
>> are any wiser, nor (importantly) any closer to agreement.
> This is why it should be an editorial decision, not a group vote.  The  
> least-objectionable alternative is rarely the best alternative, and  
> trying to please everyone is a fool's errand.  Hopefully, this time, the  
> group will let me, as editor, evaluate the options and supporting  
> rationale and make a decision based on that.

Yeah, if that works, it's fine. Back then we were in a position where  
people cared enough to object, so we chose a different way of making most  
of the people unhappy that drew less objection...


Chaals (You think this is bad, people bikeshed how I should write  
*my*name* ...)

Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile  Opera Software, Standards Group
     je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan noen norsk
http://my.opera.com/chaals       Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 10:55:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:34 UTC