Friday, 30 December 2011
- [IndexedDB] (editorial) outdated example in "3.2.1 The IDBRequest Interface" section
- [Bug 15365] ection numbers as these tend to change rapidly and make your feedback harder to understand
- [Bug 15365] New: ection numbers as these tend to change rapidly and make your feedback harder to understand
Thursday, 29 December 2011
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
Tuesday, 27 December 2011
- [Bug 15234] Throw if IDBTransaction.objectStore() or IDBObjectStore.index() called after transaction finished
- [Bug 15030] Add IDBObjectStore.autoIncrement
- [Bug 15223] Need to add an DOMError error attribute to the IDBTransaction interface
- [Bug 15029] Change multientry to multiEntry
- [Bug 14830] Specify where index values are gotten from
- [Bug 14404] Version of an IDBDatabase from an aborted version change transaction needs to be specified
- [Bug 14199] IDBVersionChangeEvent still uses DOMString for version
- [Bug 15055] [IndexedDB] (editorial) dead link "IDBFactory.open" in 3.1.8 Requests
- [Bug 14318] Importance of the upgradeneeded event should be more explicit
- [Bug 15234] Throw if IDBTransaction.objectStore() or IDBObjectStore.index() called after transaction finished
- Re: Priorities and expectations for 2012
- Re: Priorities and expectations for 2012
Monday, 26 December 2011
- [Bug 15337] ease enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appr
- [Bug 15337] New: ease enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appr
Saturday, 24 December 2011
- [cors] how to test multiple origin values
- Re: [XHR] upload progress events ("successfully uploaded")
Friday, 23 December 2011
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Priorities and expectations for 2012
- Re: [cors] what's an example a simple request with credentials?
- Re: [cors] what's an example a simple request with credentials?
- [cors] what's an example a simple request with credentials?
- [XHR] upload progress events ("successfully uploaded")
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
Thursday, 22 December 2011
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- [Bug 15316] this is a test of the w3 html5 web messaging form
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- [Bug 15316] New: this is a test of the w3 html5 web messaging form
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: HTML Speech XG Completes, seeks feedback for eventual standardization
- RE: HTML Speech XG Completes, seeks feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: HTML Speech XG Completes, seeks feedback for eventual standardization
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
Thursday, 22 December 2011
- Re: [cors] Should browsers send non-user-controllable headers in Access-Control-Request-Headers?
- Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- [Bug 15293] HTTP/1.1 101 Web Socket Protocol Handshake Upgrade: WebSocket Connection: Upgrade WebSocket-Origin: http://www.cnodejs.org WebSocket-Location: ws://www.cnodejs.org:8088/echo
- Re: [cors] The case of Http Headers in Access-Control-Request-Headers
- RfC: pre-LC RDFa 1.1; deadline January 15
- Re: [cors] Should browsers send non-user-controllable headers in Access-Control-Request-Headers?
- [Bug 15306] [XHR] (editorial) Mark the event summary section as non-normative.
- [Bug 15305] [XHR] (editorial) Missing "When set: " in the non-nomative box of the responseType attribute.
- [Bug 15307] [XHR] (editorial) the Extensibilty section suggest method prefixing like FooBar() instead of fooBar()
- Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- Re: [cors] The case of Http Headers in Access-Control-Request-Headers
- [Bug 15292] HTTP/1.1 101 WebSocket Protocol Handshake Upgrade: WebSocket Connection: Upgrade Sec-WebSocket-Origin: http://example.com Sec-WebSocket-Location: ws://example.com/demo Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: sample
- Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- Re: [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method
- [CORS] Access-Control-Request-Method was Re: [CORS] Allow-Access-Request-Method
- Re: [CORS] Allow-Access-Request-Method
- [CORS] Allow-Access-Request-Method
- Re: [cors] Should browsers send non-user-controllable headers in Access-Control-Request-Headers?
- Heads up: RDFa 1.1 headed into Last Call in January 2012
- Re: [cors] The case of Http Headers in Access-Control-Request-Headers
- [cors] The case of Http Headers in Access-Control-Request-Headers
- [cors] Should browsers send non-user-controllable headers in Access-Control-Request-Headers?
- [Bug 15307] New: [XHR] (editorial) the Extensibilty section suggest method prefixing like FooBar() instead of fooBar()
- [Bug 15306] New: [XHR] (editorial) Mark the event summary section as non-normative.
- [Bug 15305] New: [XHR] (editorial) Missing "When set: " in the non-nomative box of the responseType attribute.
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [cors] Simple Header question
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- [cors] Simple Header question
- Re: Bug in file system Api specification
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]
- Bug Tracking for the File* specs [Was: Re: Bug in file system Api specification]
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: CfC: add Quota API to WebApps' charter; deadline December 20
- Bug in file system Api specification
- [Bug 15293] New: HTTP/1.1 101 Web Socket Protocol Handshake Upgrade: WebSocket Connection: Upgrade WebSocket-Origin: http://www.cnodejs.org WebSocket-Location: ws://www.cnodejs.org:8088/echo
- [Bug 15292] New: HTTP/1.1 101 WebSocket Protocol Handshake Upgrade: WebSocket Connection: Upgrade Sec-WebSocket-Origin: http://example.com Sec-WebSocket-Location: ws://example.com/demo Sec-WebSocket-Protocol: sample
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- Re: [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
- [webcomponents]: First draft of the Shadow DOM Specification
Tuesday, 20 December 2011
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [cors] Content-Type
- [XHR] Invoking open() from event listeners
- [Bug 15279] New: Update WebSockets tests to remove support for MozWebSocket
- Re: CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
Monday, 19 December 2011
- CfC: CORS to advance to Last Call
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- [Bug 15266] I m testing the websocket, Please kindly neglect
- [Bug 15266] New: I m testing the websocket, Please kindly neglect
- Re: Proposed Specification for find/findAll/matches
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
Sunday, 18 December 2011
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [From-Origin] on "privacy leakage"
- Re: [From-Origin] editorial
- [Bug 15257] Should synchronous flag be cleared after state is set to UNSENT or DONE?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: XBL2, Component Model and WebApps' Rechartering [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
Saturday, 17 December 2011
- [Bug 15257] New: Should synchronous flag be cleared after state is set to UNSENT or DONE?
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: XBL2, Component Model and WebApps' Rechartering [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
- Re: CfC: add Quota API to WebApps' charter; deadline December 20
- Re: [CORS] Does "Origin" have to be included in the "Access-Control-Request-Headers" field?
- Re: XBL2, Component Model and WebApps' Rechartering [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- RE: IndexedDB: calling IDBTransaction.objectStore() or IDBObjectStore.index() after transaction is finished?
Friday, 16 December 2011
- Re: IndexedDB: calling IDBTransaction.objectStore() or IDBObjectStore.index() after transaction is finished?
- Re: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- Re: IndexedDB: calling IDBTransaction.objectStore() or IDBObjectStore.index() after transaction is finished?
- Re: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- Re: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- RE: IndexedDB: calling IDBTransaction.objectStore() or IDBObjectStore.index() after transaction is finished?
- Re: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- [Bug 15234] New: Throw if IDBTransaction.objectStore() or IDBObjectStore.index() called after transaction finished
- Re: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- Re: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- Re: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- Re: CfC: add Quota API to WebApps' charter; deadline December 20
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- Re: IndexedDB: calling IDBTransaction.objectStore() or IDBObjectStore.index() after transaction is finished?
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: [Pointer Lock] Few comments
Thursday, 15 December 2011
- Re: [Pointer Lock] Few comments
- [Bug 15223] New: Need to add an DOMError error attribute to the IDBTransaction interface
- Re: [Pointer Lock] Few comments
- IndexedDB: calling IDBTransaction.objectStore() or IDBObjectStore.index() after transaction is finished?
- Re: [Pointer Lock] Few comments
- Re: [Pointer Lock] Few comments
- Widget-DSig's choice of RSA-4096 Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- RE: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- [Pointer Lock] Few comments
- [Bug 15210] New: Consider dispatching an event when bufferedAmount drops to 0
- [Bug 15209] New: send() should not close the connection so easily
- Re: CfC: add Quota API to WebApps' charter; deadline December 20
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
Wednesday, 14 December 2011
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: Revisiting Command Elements and Toolbars
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- RE: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: CfC: publish new WD of DOM4; deadline December 21
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- RE: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- CfC: publish new WD of DOM4; deadline December 21
- Re: [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Barewords in on* attributes, redux (also, find() and company)
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: Proposed Specification for find/findAll/matches
- Re: [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- [FileAPI] createObjectURL isReusable proposal
- Re: [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- [FileAPI] Remove readAsBinaryString?
- [FileAPI] Length of the opaque string for blob URLs
- [FileAPI] Blob protocol version - is this needed?
- [stream-api] Editor's Draft for Streams API
- [Bug 15141] DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope IDL formatting is broken
- [Bug 15094] When creating a worker, it should be possible to assign some arguments to the constructor, or pass an init object like so: var worker = new Worker("someurl.js", { someData: "1234" }); The object passed could be made available as the current context (this.
Tuesday, 13 December 2011
- Re: [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- Re: postMessage is the new wtf
- Re: postMessage is the new wtf
- Re: postMessage is the new wtf
- Re: postMessage is the new wtf
- Re: postMessage is the new wtf
- Re: postMessage is the new wtf
- Re: postMessage is the new wtf
- Re: postMessage is the new wtf
- Re: HTML Speech XG Completes, seeks feedback for eventual standardization
- [widgets] Widget Interface is a W3C Candidate Recommendation; Call for Implementations
- [widgets] How to divorce widgets-digsig from Elliptic Curve PAG?
- postMessage is the new wtf
- [XHR]
- Re: HTML Speech XG Completes, seeks feedback for eventual standardization
- CfC: add Quota API to WebApps' charter; deadline December 20
- Fwd: Re: Quota API and WebApps [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
- Re: HTML Speech XG Completes, seeks feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: Proposed Specification for find/findAll/matches
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: Quota API and WebApps [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
Monday, 12 December 2011
- HTML Speech XG Completes, seeks feedback for eventual standardization
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: Proposed Specification for find/findAll/matches
- Re: Proposed Specification for find/findAll/matches
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: Publishing XHR (level 1 and 2)...
- Re: Publishing XHR (level 1 and 2)...
- Publishing XHR (level 1 and 2)...
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: Web IDL sequence<T> and item() method
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
Sunday, 11 December 2011
Saturday, 10 December 2011
Monday, 12 December 2011
- Proposed Specification for find/findAll/matches
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
Sunday, 11 December 2011
- Re: Web IDL sequence<T> and item() method
- Re: Web IDL sequence<T> and item() method
- Re: Web IDL sequence<T> and item() method
- Re: Web IDL sequence<T> and item() method
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: Web IDL sequence<T> and item() method
- Re: Web IDL sequence<T> and item() method
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- [Bug 15141] DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope IDL formatting is broken
Friday, 9 December 2011
- [Bug 15134] New: Please explain what the proper behavior of getSelection on a display:none iframe is
- [Bug 15104] In reply to: <p class="warning">Following HTTP procedures here could introduce serious security problems in a Web browser context. For example, consider a host with a WebSocket server at one path and an open HTTP redirector at another. Suddenl
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Web IDL sequence<T> and item() method
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- [Bug 15129] Vxvzvxvjbcb vs avatars Bdhzgzgagdffgx Vvgbv bb Gvvcn. Bcc cf hghvhhcygfg fscsssxaxsszzxcxs Gets es Gvvfvbvfamtsf
- [Bug 15129] New: Vxvzvxvjbcb vs avatars Bdhzgzgagdffgx Vvgbv bb Gvvcn. Bcc cf hghvhhcygfg fscsssxaxsszzxcxs Gets es Gvvfvbvfamtsf
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- [Bug 15127] Please don't use section numbers as these tend to change rapidly and make your feedback harder to understand.
- [Bug 15127] New: Please don't use section numbers as these tend to change rapidly and make your feedback harder to understand.
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- FW: Question about the ProgressEvent implementation status
Thursday, 8 December 2011
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked requests
- Call for Implementations: Web Storage
- Call for Implementations: WebSocket API
- [XHR] chunked requests
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- RE: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404
Wednesday, 7 December 2011
- Re: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404
- RE: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404
- Re: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404
- RE: [indexeddb] error value of open request after aborting VERSION_CHANGE transaction inside an onupgradeneeded handler
- RE: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404
- [Bug 15104] New: In reply to: <p class="warning">Following HTTP procedures here could introduce serious security problems in a Web browser context. For example, consider a host with a WebSocket server at one path and an open HTTP redirector at another. Suddenl
- [Bug 13786] Drop the charset parameter or made it non-conforming. Other MIME types introduced by this specification do not allow the charset parameter.
- Re: [Component Model]: Decorators and Fallback Content
- Re: Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: November 2011 updates
- Re: [Component Model]: Decorators and Fallback Content
- Re: [Component Model]: Decorators and Fallback Content
- Re: [Component Model]: Decorators and Fallback Content
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 15096] 1.function supports_html5_storage() { 2. try { 3. return 'localStorage' in window && window['localStorage'] !== null; 4. } catch (e) { 5. return false; 6. } 7.}
- [Bug 15097] function supports_html5_storage() { try { return 'localStorage' in window && window['localStorage'] !== null; } catch (e) { return false; } }
- Re: Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: November 2011 updates
- [Bug 15097] New: function supports_html5_storage() { try { return 'localStorage' in window && window['localStorage'] !== null; } catch (e) { return false; } }
- [Bug 15096] New: 1.function supports_html5_storage() { 2. try { 3. return 'localStorage' in window && window['localStorage'] !== null; 4. } catch (e) { 5. return false; 6. } 7.}
- [Component Model]: Decorators and Fallback Content
- Re: [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries...
- [Workers] Worker same-origin and usage in JS libraries...
- [Bug 15094] New: When creating a worker, it should be possible to assign some arguments to the constructor, or pass an init object like so: var worker = new Worker("someurl.js", { someData: "1234" }); The object passed could be made available as the current context (this.
- Re: Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: November 2011 updates
- Re: Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: November 2011 updates
- Re: Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: November 2011 updates
Tuesday, 6 December 2011
- Re: [cors] when a preflight goes bad
- Standards for Web applications on mobile devices: November 2011 updates
- Feedback requested for UndoManager and DOM Transaction
- [Bug 10623] Simplify Web IDL exceptions
Monday, 5 December 2011
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [cors] when a preflight goes bad
- Re: [cors] when a preflight goes bad
- Re: [cors] when a preflight goes bad
- [cors] when a preflight goes bad
- [dom] Mutation Observers
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- [Bug 15059] Hi this the first test of my html5.
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- [Bug 15059] New: Hi this the first test of my html5.
Sunday, 4 December 2011
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: [indexeddb] error value of open request after aborting VERSION_CHANGE transaction inside an onupgradeneeded handler
- Re: [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404
- [Bug 15055] New: [IndexedDB] (editorial) dead link "IDBFactory.open" in 3.1.8 Requests
- Re: Data uris, was: Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Data uris, was: Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: [cors] 7.2 seems to make * unusable
- [cors] 7.2 seems to make * unusable
Saturday, 3 December 2011
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Data uris, was: Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Data uris, was: Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Data uris, was: Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
Friday, 2 December 2011
- Re: [File API] Other sources for Blob data.
- Re: [File API] Other sources for Blob data.
- Re: [cors] 'custom request headers'
- Re: [File API] Other sources for Blob data.
- Re: [cors] JAX-RS and preflight
- Re: [File API] Other sources for Blob data.
- [cors] 'custom request headers'
- [Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
- [Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: CfC: publish WG Note of the "old" XHR(1); deadline December 8
- Re: CfC: publish WG Note of the "old" XHR(1); deadline December 8
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- Re: [cors] JAX-RS and preflight
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: [XHR] responseType "json"
- [XHR] responseType "json"
- RfC: Geolocation API Level 2 Last Call; deadline January 15
- RfC: DeviceOrientation Event Specification Last Call; deadline January 15
- RE: [indexeddb] error value of open request after aborting VERSION_CHANGE transaction inside an onupgradeneeded handler
- Re: [cors] JAX-RS and preflight
- Re: file sharing services
- Re: [cors] JAX-RS and preflight
Thursday, 1 December 2011
- Re: file sharing services
- Re: [cors] JAX-RS and preflight
- Re: file sharing services
- Re: CfC: publish WG Note of the "old" XHR(1); deadline December 8
- Re: [cors] JAX-RS and preflight
- Re: [cors] JAX-RS and preflight
- [indexeddb] Bug#14404 https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14404
- Re: CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5
- Re: file sharing services
- Re: file sharing services
- Re: file sharing services
- Re: [cors] JAX-RS and preflight
- [cors] JAX-RS and preflight
- CfC: publish WG Note of the "old" XHR(1); deadline December 8
- Re: file sharing services
- [Bug 15030] New: Add IDBObjectStore.autoIncrement
- [Bug 15029] New: Change multientry to multiEntry
- Re: CfC: publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline Oct 21
- Re: file sharing services
- RE: IndexedDB: multientry or multiEntry?
- Re: [File API] Other sources for Blob data.
- RE: Add PointerLock and Gamepad APIs to WebApps' charter; deadline December 1
- Re: file sharing services
- Re: file sharing services
- RE: CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5
- Re: CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5
- Re: CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5
Tuesday, 29 November 2011
Monday, 28 November 2011
Thursday, 1 December 2011
- Re: IndexedDB: multientry or multiEntry?
- Re: IndexedDB: multientry or multiEntry?
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- RE: IndexedDB: multientry or multiEntry?
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- RE: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5
Wednesday, 30 November 2011
- Re: IndexedDB: multientry or multiEntry?
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- IndexedDB: multientry or multiEntry?
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: Enable Compression Of A Blob To .zip File
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- [Bug 14352] Event handler IDL attributes need [TreatNonCallableAsNull]
- [Bug 14408] [IndexedDB] Cursors .key/.primaryKey/.value shouldn't throw as soon as .continue is called
- [Bug 14985] Specify how autoincrement + empty keypath works
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- [Bug 14441] Note in IDBIndex.getKey is incorrect
- [Bug 14735] [IndexedDB] Add multientry attribute to IDBIndex
- Re: [XHR] chunked
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- [XHR] chunked
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- CfC: publish new WD of XHR; deadline December 5
- Re: Enable Compression Of A Blob To .zip File
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Component Model] Decorator Challenges
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
Tuesday, 29 November 2011
- FYI: New email alias for WebAppSec WG test suite work
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- XPath and Selectors are identical, and shouldn't be co-developed
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Revisiting Command Elements and Toolbars
- XPath and find/findAll methods
- CfC: publish Candidate Recommendation of Widget Interface; deadline December 5
- Re: [Component Model] Decorator Challenges
- [Bug 14985] New: Specify how autoincrement + empty keypath works
Monday, 28 November 2011
- Web Components Explainer
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Component Model] Decorator Challenges
- Re: [Component Model] Decorator Challenges
- Re: CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of WARP; deadline December 5
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- CfC: publish Proposed Recommendation of WARP; deadline December 5
Friday, 25 November 2011
Monday, 28 November 2011
Sunday, 27 November 2011
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll (was: Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?)
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- [Component Model] Use Case: Displaying an Element across frames
- Re: [XHR2] HTML in XHR implementation feedback
Saturday, 26 November 2011
Friday, 25 November 2011
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- [Bug 14666] Be clearer about cookies and CORS
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: CfC: Add PointerLock and Gamepad APIs to WebApps' charter; deadline December 1
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll (was: Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?)
- Re: [Component Model] Decorator Challenges
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
Thursday, 24 November 2011
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll (was: Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?)
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [XHR2] HTML in XHR implementation feedback
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Widgets] CfC: add WidgetStorage interface to API spec; deadline December 1
- Re: Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll (was: Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?)
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Widgets] CfC: add WidgetStorage interface to API spec; deadline December 1
- [Widgets] CfC: add WidgetStorage interface to API spec; deadline December 1
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: PointerLock and Gamepad APIs
- CfC: Add PointerLock and Gamepad APIs to WebApps' charter; deadline December 1
- Re: [XHR2] HTML in XHR implementation feedback
- Re: XBL2, Component Model and WebApps' Rechartering [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: PointerLock and Gamepad APIs
- Re: PointerLock and Gamepad APIs
- Remaining Problems with Explicit :scope Switching in find/findAll (was: Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?)
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- PointerLock and Gamepad APIs
- Re: [Component Model] Decorator Challenges
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
Wednesday, 23 November 2011
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: Call for Contributors: TAG's Web App Storage work [Was: Re: TAG Comment on Web Storage]
- Re: Call for Contributors: TAG's Web App Storage work [Was: Re: TAG Comment on Web Storage]
- Re: Call for Contributors: TAG's Web App Storage work [Was: Re: TAG Comment on Web Storage]
- Re: [Component Model] Decorator Challenges
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Component Model] Decorator Challenges
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XBL2, Component Model and WebApps' Rechartering [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- [Bug 14665] Content-Type is not a simple header
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype WAS: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype WAS: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- Re: [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- Re: [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- Re: [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- XBL2, Component Model and WebApps' Rechartering [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
- IME and WebApps [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
- Quota API and WebApps [Was: Re: Consolidating charter changes]
- Call for Contributors: TAG's Web App Storage work [Was: Re: TAG Comment on Web Storage]
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- [indexeddb] error value of open request after aborting VERSION_CHANGE transaction inside an onupgradeneeded handler
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype WAS: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype WAS: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
Tuesday, 22 November 2011
- [Component Model] Decorator Challenges
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype WAS: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype WAS: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Web Intents] Task Force Mailing List set up
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype WAS: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- [Bug 14900] New: note about checking "origin" attribute of MessageEvent
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: Adding methods to Element.prototype WAS: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Adding methods to Element.prototype WAS: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: window.find already exists
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
Monday, 21 November 2011
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- Re: XPath and find/findAll methods
- XPath and find/findAll methods
- Re: [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- Re: Widgets are moving to Native Web Apps CG
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: [XHR2] HTML in XHR implementation feedback
- Re: [XHR2] HTML in XHR implementation feedback
- Re: window.find already exists
- [Widgets] WidgetStorage interface
- Re: window.find already exists
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: window.find already exists
- window.find already exists
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations?
- Re: [XHR2] HTML in XHR implementation feedback
- Re: [Web Intents] Task Force Mailing List set up
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Revising Web Storage, was: Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
Sunday, 20 November 2011
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Widgets are moving to Native Web Apps CG
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
Saturday, 19 November 2011
- Re: Opening discussion on StreamWorker
- Re: Opening discussion on StreamWorker
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
Friday, 18 November 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] transaction order
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- [Web Intents] Task Force Mailing List set up
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of Web Storage; deadline Nov 25
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: Last Call Comments on Web Storage
- CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of Web Storage; deadline Nov 25
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- Re: Firefox bug: "Worker" load ignores Content-Type version parameter
- [Bug 14847] HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols Upgrade: WebSocket Connection: Upgrade Sec-WebSocket-Accept: nToZIrKj/IYE0NjsLns7R+Msfcg=
- Re: XHR content-type rewriting
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- [Bug 14848] HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols Upgrade: WebSocket Connection: Upgrade Sec-WebSocket-Accept: nToZIrKj/IYE0NjsLns7R+Msfcg=
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Opening discussion on StreamWorker
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Opening discussion on StreamWorker
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
Thursday, 17 November 2011
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Synchronous postMessage for Workers?
- Re: XHR content-type rewriting
- [Bug 14848] New: HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols Upgrade: WebSocket Connection: Upgrade Sec-WebSocket-Accept: nToZIrKj/IYE0NjsLns7R+Msfcg=
- [Bug 14847] New: HTTP/1.1 101 Switching Protocols Upgrade: WebSocket Connection: Upgrade Sec-WebSocket-Accept: nToZIrKj/IYE0NjsLns7R+Msfcg=
- Re: XHR content-type rewriting
Wednesday, 16 November 2011
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- [Bug 14842] New: Update createContextualFragment if detached flag is removed
- XHR content-type rewriting
- [XHR2] HTML in XHR implementation feedback
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- RE: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- RE: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
Tuesday, 15 November 2011
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: TAG Comment on
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- TAG Comment on Web Storage
- TAG Comment on
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- RE: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- RE: What type should .findAll return
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- [Bug 14830] New: Specify where index values are gotten from
- Re: What type should .findAll return
Monday, 14 November 2011
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: Last Call Comments on Web Storage
- Re: Last Call Comments on Web Storage
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: [XHR2] overrideMimeType in state UNSENT
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- Re: Indexed database API autoIncrement
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- Re: [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- Re: [XHR2] overrideMimeType in state UNSENT
- Re: Web&TV Use Cases (was Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter)
- Re: Web&TV Use Cases (was Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter)
- Re: Web&TV Use Cases (was Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter)
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Discovery and Web Intents (was Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter)
- Web&TV Use Cases (was Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter)
- Re: Indexed database API autoIncrement
Sunday, 13 November 2011
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Web Messaging Intents, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
Thursday, 10 November 2011
Sunday, 13 November 2011
- Re: Discovery and Web Intents (was Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter)
- Re: Identifying "Test Spec Editors"; deadline Nov 11
- Re: What type should .findAll return
Saturday, 12 November 2011
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: Identifying "Test Spec Editors"; deadline Nov 11
- Discovery and Web Intents (was Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter)
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- RE: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- RE: Identifying "Test Spec Editors"; deadline Nov 11
- RE: "We just ran out of time ..." [Was: Re: Component Model f2f: Actionable things]
- Re: What type should .findAll return
Friday, 11 November 2011
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: Last Call Comments on Web Storage
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- [postmsg] Moving back to LC
- Re: Last Call Comments on Web Storage
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Last Call Comments on Web Storage
- [Bug 12859] An IDL block for window.postMessage is lacking from the W3C spec.
- [Bug 12859] An IDL block for window.postMessage is lacking from the W3C spec.
- [Bug 12859] An IDL block for window.postMessage is lacking from the W3C spec.
- [XHR2] Disable new response types for sync XHR in Window context
- [Bug 14773] New: Investigate if synchronous XHR in window context should not support new XHR responseTypes
- [workers] Moving back to LC
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: Consolidating charter changes
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: What type should .findAll return
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of WebSockets API; deadline Nov 9
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Fwd: Head's up: Geolocation API Level 2 FPWD and LC
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- What type should .findAll return
- Re: Consolidating charter changes
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Volume control Intent, was: Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
Thursday, 10 November 2011
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Sanitising HTML content through sandboxing
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Sanitising HTML content through sandboxing
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: Consolidating charter changes
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Draft minutes: 1 November 2011 f2f meeting
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Web API Design Cookbook
- Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Sanatising HTML content through sandboxing
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter
- Re: Consolidating charter changes
- Re: Consolidating charter changes
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: Consolidating charter changes
- Re: Sanatising HTML content through sandboxing
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: [XHR2] overrideMimeType in state UNSENT
- Re: [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
Wednesday, 9 November 2011
- [indexeddb] Keypath attribute lookup question
- Re: [widgets] Widget Interface test cases
- Re: [XHR2] overrideMimeType in state UNSENT
- [Bug 13807] Allow user-typed URLs and e-mail addresses to automatically become links
- Re: Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- [Bug 14745] New: Autolink on newline
- [Bug 14744] New: Allow literal []{} somehow in tests
- Re: [ElementTraversal] Moving traversal from Element Traversal to DOM4?
- Re: [ElementTraversal] Moving traversal from Element Traversal to DOM4?
- Dropping XMLHttpRequest 1 (just do 2)?
- Re: [XHR2] overrideMimeType in state UNSENT
- Re: [XHR2] overrideMimeType in state UNSENT
- [widgets] Widget Interface test cases
- Re: [ElementTraversal] Moving traversal from Element Traversal to DOM4?
- [ElementTraversal] Moving traversal from Element Traversal to DOM4?
- [XHR2] overrideMimeType in state UNSENT
- Re: Sanatising HTML content through sandboxing
- Re: Sanatising HTML content through sandboxing
- Re: Who is the audience?
- [Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
- RE: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- Re: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Sanatising HTML content through sandboxing
- [Bug 14735] New: [IndexedDB] Add multientry attribute to IDBIndex
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- RE: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
Tuesday, 8 November 2011
- Re: IndexedDB: IDBIndex.multientry attribute?
- Re: Consolidating charter changes
- Re: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- IndexedDB: IDBIndex.multientry attribute?
- [Bug 13893] Only HTML elements should be editable
- Re: Consolidating charter changes
- Re: Consolidating charter changes
- Re: State of subclassing and tag names in the component model
- Consolidating charter changes
- [Bug 13973] Refactor delete stuff
- [Bug 14729] Inline formatting should add wrappers inside empty blocks
- [Bug 13831] Deleting a block should leave style tags nested inside
- [Bug 14729] New: Inline formatting should add wrappers inside empty blocks
- [Bug 13976] Backspacing in between two lists should merge them
- [Bug 14727] New: Deleting doesn't handle non-normalized sublists correctly
- Re: State of subclassing and tag names in the component model
- Re: HTML Editing APIs is already in scope [Was: Re: Draft Minutes: 31 October 2011 f2f meeting]
- HTML Editing APIs is already in scope [Was: Re: Draft Minutes: 31 October 2011 f2f meeting]
- Re: Who is the audience?
- Re: "We just ran out of time ..." [Was: Re: Component Model f2f: Actionable things]
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Web Storage ; deadline November 15
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
Monday, 7 November 2011
- State of subclassing and tag names in the component model
- [Bug 14712] New: Clarify copyright situation of Selection text
- Re: Component Model f2f: Actionable things
- Who is the audience?
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: [XHR2] responseText for text/html before the encoding has stabilized
- Re: [XHR2] responseText for text/html before the encoding has stabilized
- Re: [XHR2] responseText for text/html before the encoding has stabilized
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
Sunday, 6 November 2011
Saturday, 5 November 2011
- Re: "We just ran out of time ..." [Was: Re: Component Model f2f: Actionable things]
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
Friday, 4 November 2011
- CfC: Identifying "Test Spec Editors"; deadline Nov 11
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- File API: "Determining encoding"
- [Bug 14695] How do I clear browsing history automatically? Is there a setting in Google Chrome, like I.E. to clear cookies and websites visited, etc. to clear everything automatically upon exiting Chrome? I cannot find one, always have to go to tools, history to dele
- [Bug 14695] New: How do I clear browsing history automatically? Is there a setting in Google Chrome, like I.E. to clear cookies and websites visited, etc. to clear everything automatically upon exiting Chrome? I cannot find one, always have to go to tools, history to dele
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- [Bug 14694] New: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: Storage Quota API
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- websocket client in C? (minimal)
- [Bug 14364] appcache: Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- RE: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of WebSockets API; deadline Nov 9
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
Thursday, 3 November 2011
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- innerHTML in DocumentFragment
- Re: "We just ran out of time ..." [Was: Re: Component Model f2f: Actionable things]
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of WebSockets API; deadline Nov 9
- [Bug 14364] appcache: Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of WebSockets API; deadline Nov 9
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of WebSockets API; deadline Nov 9
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of WebSockets API; deadline Nov 9
- Re: Copy/cut and event.preventDefault()
- Re: Copy/cut and event.preventDefault()
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of WebSockets API; deadline Nov 9
- [Bug 14684] fghfghf fgh fgh fgh fdghdffh fgh
- [Bug 14684] New: fghfghf fgh fgh fgh fdghdffh fgh
- "We just ran out of time ..." [Was: Re: Component Model f2f: Actionable things]
- CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of WebSockets API; deadline Nov 9
- Component Model f2f: Actionable things
Wednesday, 2 November 2011
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Draft minutes: 1 November 2011 f2f meeting
- [Bug 14660] [Editorial] Clarification for CLOSING in Garbage Collection
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: [File API] Calling requestFileSystem with bad filesystem type
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels [Was: Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21]
- Re: Draft Minutes: 31 October 2011 f2f meeting
- [Bug 14199] IDBVersionChangeEvent still uses DOMString for version
- [Bug 14384] "upgradeneeded" event should set request.readyState to DONE
- [Bug 14488] [IDBObjectStore|IDBIndex].count description should specify optional argument behavior a little better
- [Bug 14412] IDBFactorySync should have .cmp too
- [Bug 14199] IDBVersionChangeEvent still uses DOMString for version
- [Bug 13786] Drop the charset parameter or made it non-conforming. Other MIME types introduced by this specification do not allow the charset parameter.
- [Bug 14677] Hey, There! =D My name is Felipe. And I'm looking around this new tecnology. I'm really enjoying it.
- [Bug 14677] New: Hey, There! =D My name is Felipe. And I'm looking around this new tecnology. I'm really enjoying it.
- [Bug 14201] IDBFactory.deleteDatabase text mentions IDBVersionChangeRequest
Tuesday, 1 November 2011
- [Bug 14389] Remove =FunctionOnly from the callbacks
- [Bug 14384] "upgradeneeded" event should set request.readyState to DONE
- [Bug 14393] If exception is thrown during upgradeneeded event dispatch, abort the VERSION_CHANGE transaction
- [Bug 14384] "upgradeneeded" event should set request.readyState to DONE
- [Bug 14405] Steps for firing success/error events on a request are very transaction-centric
- [Bug 14666] New: Be clearer about cookies and CORS
- [Bug 14665] New: Content-Type is not a simple header
- [Bug 14664] New: Defining CORS headers
- [Bug 14663] New: Advice on CORS and caches
- Re: Draft Minutes: 31 October 2011 f2f meeting
- Re: [IndexedDB] Array keys / circular references
- Re: [IndexedDB] Array keys / circular references
- [Bug 14660] New: [Editorial] Clarification for CLOSING in Garbage Collection
- [IndexedDB] Array keys / circular references
- Re: Discussion topic for Webapps F2F on Nov 1
- Draft Agenda for 1 November 2011 f2f meeting
- Draft Minutes: 31 October 2011 f2f meeting
- Re: Discussion topic for Webapps F2F on Nov 1
- Re: [IndexedDB] Throwing when *creating* a transaction
- RE: [IndexedDB] Throwing when *creating* a transaction
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: [IndexedDB] Throwing when *creating* a transaction
Monday, 31 October 2011
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 14474] Make it possible to close a connection in such a manner that all subsequent events are suppressed
- [Bug 14592] EventSource should default to use "Use Credentials" set to false for CORS
- [Bug 14322] Update URL of the WebSocket protocol
- [Bug 12510] Specs split off from HTML5 (like WebSockets) need to have xrefs linked, otherwise they're ambiguous
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [IndexedDB] Throwing when *creating* a transaction
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- WebSocket treated as subresource: no HTTP auth dialogs?
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- FW: TPAC Web App
- Discussion topic for Webapps F2F on Nov 1
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
Sunday, 30 October 2011
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- [Bug 14037] Should XMLDocument be standardized?
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Enable compression of a blob to .zip file
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
Saturday, 29 October 2011
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG deliverables
- Re: [DOM4] atomicity of DocumentFragment insertion
- Re: [DOM4] Remove Node.isSameNode
Friday, 28 October 2011
- Re: [DOM4] atomicity of DocumentFragment insertion
- [Bug 14592] New: EventSource should default to use "Use Credentials" set to false for CORS
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
Thursday, 27 October 2011
Friday, 28 October 2011
- [indexeddb] 'raises' statements in IDL
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
Thursday, 27 October 2011
- [Bug 14578] New: Figure out how to behave if editing host is an inline element
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- [Bug 14331] EventSource can end up in the wrong state due to race conditions (see comment 12 paragraph 2)
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- RE: [indexeddb] DOM Level 4 Exceptions and Error updates to IDB spec
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- RfC: LCWD of Touch Events version 1; deadline November 17
- RfC: LCWD of Web Storage ; deadline November 15
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- Re: [indexeddb] DOM Level 4 Exceptions and Error updates to IDB spec
- Re: [IndexedDB] Handling missing/invalid values for indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- [Bug 13686] Remove the special case from onmessage (to call start())
- RE: [IndexedDB] Handling missing/invalid values for indexes
- [Bug 14530] Hi, In Server-Sent Events Section "Processing model", it should be clearly stated how to avoid the pipelining of HTTP requests on the connection used for an event source. HTTP pipelining - decribed in RFC 2616 / section 8.1.2.2 - is the possibility for a
Wednesday, 26 October 2011
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- RE: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- [Bug 13686] Remove the special case from onmessage (to call start())
- [Bug 13786] Drop the charset parameter or made it non-conforming. Other MIME types introduced by this specification do not allow the charset parameter.
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- [Bug 13930] Refer to rniwa's undo/redo spec
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- [Bug 13841] Investigate what should happen when hitting Enter inside nested single-line containers
- [indexeddb] DOM Level 4 Exceptions and Error updates to IDB spec
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- AW: AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: A proposal for Element constructors
- A proposal for Element constructors
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
Tuesday, 25 October 2011
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- AW: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- [Bug 14564] mlnbdv bdg gk fgbjkgjfbjgfml vl bnkl ghl
- [Bug 14564] New: mlnbdv bdg gk fgbjkgjfbjgfml vl bnkl ghl
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- AW: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: Proposal for a new Matrix API
- AW: WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- [Bug 13104] Enable keepalive on WebSocket API
- [Bug 14513] WebSocket API: Missing reference for definition of MessageEvent
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- Re: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB
- RE: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- [Bug 14148] Drop resolveURL in favor of URL()
- [Bug 13373] Privacy: Limit SharedWorker connections to same top-level domain
- [Bug 14329] Add a warning about high-volume traffic through MessagePort being a DOS risk for UAs and scripts
Monday, 24 October 2011
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Is BlobBuilder needed?
- Re: [selectors-api] Return an Array instead of a static NodeList
- Re: WebSocket API: close and error events
- [Bug 14554] New: Consider adding support for contenteditable=plaintext
- Re: [selectors-api] Return an Array instead of a static NodeList
- WebSocket API: close and error events
- Re: Disabling non-collapsed selection
- [Bug 14364] Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically
- Postponed: Request for Review: Test cases for DOM L3 Events
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of DOM 3 Events; deadline October 21
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of DOM 3 Events; deadline October 21
- Re: [selectors-api] Return an Array instead of a static NodeList
- Re: [selectors-api] Return an Array instead of a static NodeList
- Re: [selectors-api] Return an Array instead of a static NodeList
- Re: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: [selectors-api] Return an Array instead of a static NodeList
- RE: Indexed database API autoIncrement
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18
- RE: [IndexedDB] transaction order
- RE: [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of DOM 3 Events; deadline October 21
- Re: Disabling non-collapsed selection
- Re: Disabling non-collapsed selection
- [Bug 14455] When tapping within a contenteditable, mobile browsers display a VKB that hogs the screen. But what if users don't want to enter any new text? They might instead make a selection, copy it, drag to move it, format it, or paste in something else. Ideally
- [Bug 14455] When tapping within a contenteditable, mobile browsers display a VKB that hogs the screen. But what if users don't want to enter any new text? They might instead make a selection, copy it, drag to move it, format it, or paste in something else. Ideally
Sunday, 23 October 2011
- Re: Indexed database API autoIncrement
- Re: Indexed database API autoIncrement
- Re: Indexed database API autoIncrement
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Indexed database API autoIncrement
Saturday, 22 October 2011
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 14544] section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the most recently formally published rev
- [Bug 14544] New: section describes the status of this document at the time of its publication. Other documents may supersede this document. A list of current W3C publications and the most recently formally published rev
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of DOM 3 Events; deadline October 21
- Re: [indexeddb] Compound Key support for Primary Keys and Indexes
Friday, 21 October 2011
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 14364] Add an API to make appcache support caching specific URLs dynamically
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of DOM 3 Events; deadline October 21
- Re: Proposal for a new Matrix API
- Re: [XHR2] Streamed send or receive
- Re: Proposal for a new Matrix API
- Re: Proposal for a new Matrix API
- Re: Proposal for a new Matrix API
Thursday, 20 October 2011
Friday, 21 October 2011
- [Bug 14530] New: Hi, In Server-Sent Events Section "Processing model", it should be clearly stated how to avoid the pipelining of HTTP requests on the connection used for an event source. HTTP pipelining - decribed in RFC 2616 / section 8.1.2.2 - is the possibility for a
- [selectors-api] Requirements and Use Cases for Scoped Methods
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 14214] missing definition of Transferable
- [Bug 14144] Adding link to resolve the URL
- [Bug 14214] missing definition of Transferable
- Re: before/after editaction
- Re: before/after editaction
- Re: before/after editaction
Thursday, 20 October 2011
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 14527] cfgdfg dfg dfg dfg fgfdg sdftgf dhfghgdhfghfgdh fgh dfhdfhfghfghghhd
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 14527] New: cfgdfg dfg dfg dfg fgfdg sdftgf dhfghgdhfghfgdh fgh dfhdfhfghfghghhd
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Proposal for a new Matrix API
- Re: before/after editaction
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
Thursday, 20 October 2011
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: Mouse Lock
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
Wednesday, 19 October 2011
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 14513] New: WebSocket API: Missing reference for definition of MessageEvent
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 13799] Should Transferables be transfered even when postMessage fails?
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
Tuesday, 18 October 2011
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 14048] Suggestion of change in process for "dispatch the event" in Server-Sent Events
- [Bug 14480] How the data is stored at client side? Is it in some kind of file in temp folder or something. Can you please clarify.
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- [Bug 14414] Is it really can be used like Winsocket? How can I use it?
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: WebSocket "report" at TPAC?
- WebSocket "report" at TPAC?
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming
- FYI: Mobile Web Applications Interoperability Event, 6-7 December 2011, Sophia-Antipolis, France
- [IndexedDB] Handling missing/invalid values for indexes
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
Monday, 17 October 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- [Bug 14488] New: [IDBObjectStore|IDBIndex].count description should specify optional argument behavior a little better
- [Bug 13967] Webkit implementation swaps second argument 'targetOrigin' with third argument 'ports'
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- [Bug 13967] Webkit implementation swaps second argument 'targetOrigin' with third argument 'ports'
- [Bug 13967] Webkit implementation swaps second argument 'targetOrigin' with third argument 'ports'
- Reminder: WebApps TPAC2011 meeting Oct 31 and November 1; request for agenda topics
- [Bug 14480] New: How the data is stored at client side? Is it in some kind of file in temp folder or something. Can you please clarify.
Sunday, 16 October 2011
Saturday, 15 October 2011
- Disabling non-collapsed selection
- [Bug 14331] Hello! Why tasks that are queued by EventSource doesnot removed from task queues with "close" method? Thanks!
- Re: [IndexedDB] transaction order
- Re: CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of DOM 3 Events; deadline October 21
Friday, 14 October 2011
- Re: CfC: publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline Oct 21
- RE: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- [Bug 14474] New: Make it possible to close a connection in such a manner that all subsequent events are surpressed
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- [Bug 14331] Hello! Why tasks that are queued by EventSource doesnot removed from task queues with "close" method? Thanks!
- Request for Review: Test cases for DOM L3 Events
- RE: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- Re: [IndexedDB] transaction order
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- Re: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- RE: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- RE: [IndexedDB] transaction order
- CfC: publish new WD of Indexed Database API; deadline Oct 21
- CfC: publish a Candidate Recommendation of DOM 3 Events; deadline October 21
- [File API] New Draft | Re: CfC: new WD of File API; deadline Oct 17
- Re: CfC: new WD of File API; deadline Oct 17
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels [Was: Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21]
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
- Re: before/after editaction
Thursday, 13 October 2011
- Re: [indexeddb] Calling IDBDatabase.close inside onupgradeneeded handler
- Re: [File API] Blob.slice()
- Re: [File API] dependencies
- Re: [File API] FileList
- Re: [File API] Dereferencing Model for Blob URIs
- RE: [indexeddb] Calling IDBDatabase.close inside onupgradeneeded handler
- RE: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- Re: [DOM3Events] Oustanding issues (was: [DOM3Events] CR)
- CfC: publish LCWD of Web Storage; deadline Oct 20
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: [indexeddb] Calling IDBDatabase.close inside onupgradeneeded handler
- Re: [DOM3 Events] Some comments on Basic Event Interfaces
- Re: [DOM3Events] Oustanding issues (was: [DOM3Events] CR)
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- RE: [DOM3Events] Oustanding issues (was: [DOM3Events] CR)
- Re: [DOM3Events] Oustanding issues (was: [DOM3Events] CR)
- re: [DOM3 Events] Some comments on Basic Event Interfaces
- [DOM3Events] Oustanding issues (was: [DOM3Events] CR)
Wednesday, 12 October 2011
- RE: [indexeddb] Calling IDBDatabase.close inside onupgradeneeded handler
- Re: [indexeddb] Calling IDBDatabase.close inside onupgradeneeded handler
- [indexeddb] Calling IDBDatabase.close inside onupgradeneeded handler
- [Bug 14441] New: Note in IDBIndex.getKey is incorrect
- [IndexedDB] IDBObjectStore.delete should accept a KeyRange
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- [components] Summary of open questions
- [Bug 14084] Hi! Returning a null from getItem() if the key does not exist is downright semantically wrong. null is a full-fledged value which can be serialized (JSONed), and is NOT the value we get if we do: var x = myObject.someUnknownProperty; In that case we get t
Tuesday, 11 October 2011
- Re: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: [widgets] Killing file:// of evil (widget URI ready for pub)
- [Bug 14084] Hi! Returning a null from getItem() if the key does not exist is downright semantically wrong. null is a full-fledged value which can be serialized (JSONed), and is NOT the value we get if we do: var x = myObject.someUnknownProperty; In that case we get t
- [Bug 13972] var bgPage = chrome.extension.getBackgroundPage(); function saveTabData(tab, data) { if (tab.incognito) { bgPage[tab.url] = data; // Persist data ONLY in memory } else { localStorage[tab.url] = data; // OK to store data }
- RE: Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Reminder: RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL; deadline October 18
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: [cors] Failed sharing check and cookies
- Re: Gave a try to the Component Model
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- Re: [cors] Failed sharing check and cookies
- Re: [cors] Failed sharing check and cookies
- Re: [cors] Failed sharing check and cookies
- [cors] Failed sharing check and cookies
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: [IndexedDB] Soliciting feedback from SQL Vendors
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- [Bug 13761] Now that event data can be discarded (if there is no newline before eof), the last id field value received should be stored in a buffer and set as the EventSource's lastEventId only when the event is actually dispatched. That way the id associated with th
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
Monday, 10 October 2011
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: [IndexedDB] Soliciting feedback from SQL Vendors
- Re: Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- Re: Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- Re: Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- Re: Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels [Was: Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21]
- Re: Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- Re: [IndexedDB] Soliciting feedback from SQL Vendors
- [IndexedDB] Soliciting feedback from SQL Vendors
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- W3Conf: conference for Web App developers November 15-16
- RE: IndexedDB: ordering sense of IDBFactory.cmp?
- RE: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- CfC: new WD of File API; deadline Oct 17
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- Gave a try to the Component Model
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- [Bug 14414] New: Is it really can be used like Winsocket? How can I use it?
Sunday, 9 October 2011
Saturday, 8 October 2011
Sunday, 9 October 2011
- [Bug 14412] New: IDBFactorySync should have .cmp too
- CfC: publish new WD of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline Oct 16
- CfC: publish new WD of Server-Sent Events; deadline Oct 16
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels [Was: Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21]
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
Friday, 7 October 2011
- [Bug 14408] New: [IndexedDB] Cursors .key/.primaryKey/.value shouldn't throw as soon as .continue is called
- RE: [IndexedDB] transaction order
- RE: [indexeddb] Exception type for NON_TRANSIENT_ERR code
- Re: Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- Re: Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- RE: [indexeddb] Change IDBRequest.errorCode property to match new Exception type model
- Re: Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- [Bug 13717] Clarify that a MessagePort clone, when created, hasn't been transfered, even if it was created as a result of another being transfered. ("If any object is listed in transfer more than once, or any of the Transferable objects listed in transfer have alread
- Re: Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- [IndexedDB] transaction order
- Question about implementing DataTransfer.addElement
- Re: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- CfC: adding Mutation Observers to DOM4; deadline Oct 14 [Was: Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events]
- [Bug 14406] ÑвавÑп ав Ñав Ñ Ñ
- [Bug 14406] New: ÑвавÑп ав Ñав Ñ Ñ
- [File API] Calling requestFileSystem with bad filesystem type
- RE: [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
- [Bug 14405] New: Steps for firing success/error events on a request are very transaction-centric
- [Bug 14404] New: Version of an IDBDatabase from an aborted version change transaction needs to be specified
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
- Re: Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels [Was: Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21]
Thursday, 6 October 2011
Friday, 7 October 2011
- Spec changes for LCs and later maturity levels [Was: Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21]
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG deliverables
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG deliverables
- [IndexedDB] Passing an empty array to IDBDatabase.transaction
Thursday, 6 October 2011
- [Bug 13584] [web messaging] Channel Messaging Origins
- [Bug 13584] [web messaging] Channel Messaging Origins
- RE: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- RE: Joint meeting of the CSS/WebApps/WebFonts WGs
- Re: Generic guide to exceptions, events, etc. for new APIs Re: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB
- Re: Generic guide to exceptions, events, etc. for new APIs Re: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB
- Re: Joint meeting of the CSS/WebApps/WebFonts WGs
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- [Bug 14396] ddfsdfsdf sdf fdsgshdf vjlh fjhvkjds hkjdfh jdsgfvslhjfdvhd
- [Bug 14396] New: ddfsdfsdf sdf fdsgshdf vjlh fjhvkjds hkjdfh jdsgfvslhjfdvhd
- [Bug 14395] asd asasd asda dasd as d
- [Bug 14395] New: asd asasd asda dasd as d
- Re: XBL2 is dead.
- Re: [XHR2] Streamed send or receive
- Re: [XHR2] Streamed send or receive
- [XHR2] Streamed send or receive
- [Bug 14094] EventSource: Add example of listening for and using an event type other than 'message'
Wednesday, 5 October 2011
- [Bug 14393] New: If exception is thrown during upgradeneeded event dispatch, abort the VERSION_CHANGE transaction
- [Bug 13772] Example code should contain a comma instead of semicolon: worker.port.postMessage({ foo: 'structured', bar: ['data', 'also', 'possible']});
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- Re: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- [Bug 13975] Get rid of multi-Range Selections
- Joint meeting of the CSS/WebApps/WebFonts WGs
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- New tests for element traversal properties
- [Bug 14389] New: Remove =FunctionOnly from the callbacks
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- [Bug 14252] Put DOM Range to rest
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- Re: [DOM4] XML lang
- [DOM4] XML lang
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
- Re: RfC: LCWD of Web Socket API; comment deadline October 21
Tuesday, 4 October 2011
- [Bug 13856] I am not sure whether it is due to the nature of this documentation but it would be very helpful to include an example of HTTP response and how it should react to HTTP 3xx and 4xx.
- [Bug 14384] New: "upgradeneeded" event should set request.readyState to DONE
- Re: [From-Origin] on "privacy leakage"
- [From-Origin] editorial
- [Bug 14383] New: Investigate interaction between focus and selection
- [Bug 14248] Merge selection spec into editing spec
- [Bug 13812] The EventSource garbage collection does not mention open/error events. It also does not seem to match the language entirely of WebSocket garbage collection.
- [Bug 13913] Attributes don't have an order
- [Bug 13908] WordStar semantics aren't supported
- [Bug 13910] There can never be no active range
- [Bug 13794] I think length-prefixed messages would be a lot more useful than line-delimited messages. Sentinel terminators, especially newlines, are more error prone to generate and parse than a few bytes of length prefix followed by a message, repeat. In addition, t
- Re: Adding Web Intents to the Webapps WG deliverables
- Re: Fwd: W3C Workshop on the Future of Offline Web Applications (Call for Participation)
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Reminder: RfC: LCWD of Touch Events version 1; deadline October 11
- Re: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- [Bug 14376] New: Move to the new WebIDL exceptions
- Re: Notes from a component model pow-wow
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: [indexeddb] Exception type for NON_TRANSIENT_ERR code
- Re: [indexeddb] Implicit Transaction Request associated with failed transactions
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: [indexeddb] Change IDBRequest.errorCode property to match new Exception type model
- Re: [indexeddb] Exception type for NON_TRANSIENT_ERR code
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [indexeddb] Exception type for NON_TRANSIENT_ERR code
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- [indexeddb] Change IDBRequest.errorCode property to match new Exception type model
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [indexeddb] Exception type for NON_TRANSIENT_ERR code
Monday, 3 October 2011
- [Bug 14323] This API could easily be used by XForms implementations if protocols such as "localstorage://" could also be specified. Thanks! Alain Couthures agenceXML Invited Expert in Forms Work Group
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- [indexeddb] Exception type for NON_TRANSIENT_ERR code
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: Generic guide to exceptions, events, etc. for new APIs Re: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- RE: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB
- Re: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- Re: [FileAPI] Event handler IDL attributes
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- Re: IndexedDB: ordering sense of IDBFactory.cmp?
- IndexedDB: ordering sense of IDBFactory.cmp?
- [Bug 14331] Hello! Why tasks that are queued by EventSource doesnot removed from task queues with "close" method? Thanks!
- [Bug 14288] document.documentElement.insertAdjacentHTML specs WebKit behavior instead of IE behavior
- [Bug 14364] New: [appcache] manifest attribute should accept data-uris
- Re: [XHR2] responseText for text/html before the encoding has stabilized
- Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- [Bug 14351] Event handler IDL attributes need [TreatNonCallableAsNull]
- Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components
- Re: [From-Origin] on "privacy leakage"
- Re: [From-Origin] on "clickjacking"
- Re: [From-Origin] on "theft"
- Re: [XHR2] responseText for text/html before the encoding has stabilized
Sunday, 2 October 2011
- [Bug 14331] Hello! Why tasks that are queued by EventSource doesnot removed from task queues with "close" method? Thanks!
- Generic guide to exceptions, events, etc. for new APIs Re: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB
- Re: [XHR2] responseText for text/html before the encoding has stabilized
Saturday, 1 October 2011
- Re: [XHR2] responseText for text/html before the encoding has stabilized
- [FileAPI] Event handler IDL attributes
- [Bug 14352] New: Event handler IDL attributes need [TreatNonCallableAsNull]
- [Bug 14351] New: Event handler IDL attributes need [TreatNonCallableAsNull]
- Re: [XHR2] responseText for text/html before the encoding has stabilized
- Re: [XHR2] responseText for text/html before the encoding has stabilized
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() and File[Saver|Writer].abort have different behaviors
- Re: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB
- Re: Mutation Observers: a replacement for DOM Mutation Events
- RE: [File API] Issue 182 about OperationNotAllowed
- RE: [indexeddb] New WebIDL Exception Model for IndexedDB
- Re: IndexedDB: spec nit - IDBFactory.cmp returns int?