- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 11:51:48 -0700
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Cc: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 18:52:42 UTC
Hi Cameron, Does the ECMAScript binding for the IDL sequence<T> type imply the existence of an item() method as a element accessor, where an element is a property whose property name is an array index? If so, then could describe how it is implied? The reason I ask is because I'm wondering about compatibility with earlier DOM specs, e.g., NodeList, CSSRuleList, etc., where an explicit item() method is defined, and which, in recent newer specifications based on Web IDL, has been re-expressed in terms of sequence<T>. In my review of ECMA 262 3rd and 5th editions, I don't see an explicit mention of an item() method on Array objects (or their prototype), which are the ECMAScript binding for IDL sequence<T>. If the answer is that no item() method is implied, then does the use of sequence<T> in these newer specs entail dropping this method (with respect to prior DOM specs)? Regards, Glenn
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 18:52:42 UTC