- From: Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:20:06 -0500
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
There's a problem with REST-ful services, as exemplified by the JAX-RS standard, and CORS as drafted. A JAX-RS server names a resource, in part, via the content-type of a request. A POST with content-type of application/json names a different resource (in as much as it selects a different method to call) that a POST with content-type text/plain. The problem here is that a preflight OPTIONS is defined to *not* pass the content type unless it is simple. Thus, the service implementation can't reliably tell what resource is under discussion. As things are, a service would have to take a common posture for all preflights given the URL and Accept(-*) headers, and ignoring the content type. Would you consider defining an Ac-Request-Content-Type header to pass a non-simple content type on a preflight?
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2011 20:46:34 UTC