Re: Behavior Attachment Redux, was Re: HTML element content models vs. components

On Tue, 11 Oct 2011, Dimitri Glazkov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org> wrote:
> > Splitting this up into two different things is great.
> 
> The specific meaning of "splitting up" is where the things get
> interesting. As far as I understand Hixie's idea, the component (which
> exposes API) and the binding (which supplies shadow tree) aren't
> coupled, which means they can share no internal state.

As far as I'm concerned, the term "component" and the term "binding" mean 
the same thing.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 18:22:59 UTC