- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 09:33:17 +0100
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- CC: "public-webapps@w3.org" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On 2011-12-03 19:43, Charles Pritchard wrote: > ... > If there were a mime type that were more appropriate for > compressed/non-compressed use, would it simply be: "image/svg" ? I think the obvious choice would be "image/svgz", which should be really short, as it can be defined as gipped-wrapped image/svg+xml. Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 4 December 2011 08:33:49 UTC