- From: John-David Dalton <john.david.dalton@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 09:51:34 -0600
- To: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: public-webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
I've been half following this thread. I'm not sure why renaming to XHR is a good idea. The DOM spec has levels (Level 2, 3) so I don't see the need to consolidate. I like the distinction and it gives devs some marker to follow for support in libs/projects. If you did drop the XHR levels, which I am not for, then a prominent comment block should persist explaining it. - JDD On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > Are you suggesting that the link [1] be changed to forward or refer to the > new XHR2 work? > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/CR-XMLHttpRequest-20100803/ > If so, then that would be a problem. > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Giuseppe Pascale <giuseppep@opera.com> > wrote: >> >> well, what I was asking is to make sure that if I go to xhr1 I actually >> find 2 >> Anyway I think this is what marcos and anne were saying, so fine. >
Received on Sunday, 27 November 2011 15:52:03 UTC