- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:22:42 +0100
- To: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- CC: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-archive@w3.org, public-Webapps@w3.org, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
On 2011-11-18 13:03, Simon Pieters wrote: > UTF-8-only for workers is deliberate. I don't see any reason to reject > scripts that have other charset. Rejecting the script would mean that > some authors can't use workers at all because their server uses charset > and they can't change it. What kind of server sets a charset on JS *and* cannot be configured not to? And, if this is the case, isn't this a good reason to actually require that the charset is handled correctly? I really believe that piling up workarounds and inconsistencies like these makes the whole platform much harder to use than necessary. Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 18 November 2011 12:23:16 UTC