- From: Jarred Nicholls <jarred@webkit.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:33:44 -0500
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Web Applications Working Group WG (public-webapps@w3.org)" <public-webapps@w3.org>, Feras Moussa <ferasm@microsoft.com>
+1 though it won't likely go away from implementations as easily. On Dec 13, 2011, at 8:22 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > Seems quite reasonable to me. We've got data URL strings for people who need inefficiency (or portable strings). > > > > On Dec 13, 2011, at 4:52 PM, Adrian Bateman <adrianba@microsoft.com> wrote: > >> Another topic that came up at TPAC was readAsBinaryString [1]. This method >> predates support for typed arrays in the FileAPI and allows binary data >> to be read and stored in a string. This is an inefficient way to store >> data now that we have ArrayBuffer and we'd like to not support this method. >> >> At TPAC I proposed that we remove readAsBinaryString from the spec and >> there was some support for this idea. I'd like to propose that we change >> the spec to remove this. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Adrian. >> >> [1] http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#readAsBinaryString >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2011 02:34:15 UTC