- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 06:51:17 +0000
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14214
Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WONTFIX |
--- Comment #3 from Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> 2011-10-21 06:51:16 UTC ---
I would like to see an either a link from the use of Transferable to the
definition in HTML5 or an explicit mention of Transferable as a dependent type
defined in HTML5.
In particular, under 2.1 Dependencies, there is the text:
"HTML Many fundamental concepts from HTML are used by this specification.
[HTML]"
I wish to make certain that every normatively fundamental concept (including
types) that are defined in HTML5 and used by this specification are either
explicitly linked or are enumerated under 2.1 Dependencies. I would suggest
that linking would be preferable to enumerating.
G.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Friday, 21 October 2011 06:51:24 UTC