- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:27:54 +0100
- To: public-webapps@w3.org
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:21:34 +0100, Arun Ranganathan <aranganathan@mozilla.com> wrote: > Adrian: I'm willing to relax this. I suppose it *is* inconsistent to > insist on 36 chars when we don't insist on UUID. But I suspect when it > comes time to making blob: a registered protocol (it was discussed on > the IETF/URI listserv), the lack of MUSTs will be a sticking point. > We'll take that as it comes, though :) I do not really see why Chrome cannot simply use UUID as well. It's not exactly rocket science. It seems that is the only sticking point to just having the same type of URLs across the board. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Friday, 16 December 2011 11:28:32 UTC