- From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 18:03:37 +0200
- To: WebApps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > On Dec 2, 2011, at 14:00 , Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I tied it to UTF-8 to further the fight on encoding proliferation and encourage developers to always use that encoding. > > That's a good fight, but I think this is the wrong battlefield. IIRC (valid) JSON can only be in UTF-8,16,32 (with BE/LE variants) and all of those are detectable rather easily. The only thing this limitation is likely to bring is pain when dealing with resources outside one's control. Browsers don't support UTF-32. It has no use cases as an interchange encoding beyond writing evil test cases. Defining it as a valid encoding is reprehensible. Does anyone actually transfer JSON as UTF-16? -- Henri Sivonen hsivonen@iki.fi http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Friday, 2 December 2011 16:04:18 UTC