- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:05:08 -0500
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org
On 12/22/11 4:51 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 05:37:35 +0100, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: >> What might be confusing the issue is that preflights are not always >> done, maybe? A preflight, per >> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/cors/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#cross-origin-request >> is done in the following cases: >> >> 1) The "force preflight" flag is set. >> 2) The request method is not a simple method. >> 3) There is an author request header that's not a simple header. >> >> (though it looks to me like item 1 is broken by the actual algorithm >> for doing a "cross-origin request with preflight"; Anne?) > > If you mean that the cache is still honored maybe I should use a > different name for "force preflight flag". Maybe "force cross-origin > request with preflight flag"? The point is mostly that we should figure > out the server if the server supports non-simple cross-origin requests > for the given URL. No, what I mean is this. Say we enter http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/cors/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#cross-origin-request with the following state: * "force preflight" flag is true * Request method is simple method * No author request headers * Empty preflight cache (not that this matters) The spec says we should "follow the cross-origin request with preflight algorithm." Following that link, it says: Go to the next step if the following conditions are true: For request method there either is a method cache match or it is a simple method. For every header of author request headers there either is a header cache match for the field name or it is a simple header. Since the method is a simple method and there are no author request headers, we skip the preflight and go on to the main request. Now it's possible that I simply don't understand what this flag is _supposed_ to do or that I'm missing something.... >> In any case, if you're using XHR then #1 is likely not relevant, > > Actually it is: > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#cross-origin-request-steps Ah, interesting. OK. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 22 December 2011 16:05:38 UTC