- From: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:46:02 +0100
- To: "ext Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>, "James Hawkins" <jhawkins@google.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, "Ian Fette" <ifette@google.com>
On Thu, 10 Nov 2011 14:36:24 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > On 11/10/11 4:36 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Nov 9, 2011, at 00:25 , James Hawkins wrote: >>> Under 'Additions Agreed': >>> * Web Intents - this will be a joint deliverable with DAPI WG >>> >>> Pedantically, not politically: My recollection is that the agreement >>> was only to add Web Intents to the Webapps charter (neither accepting >>> nor denying a joint deliverable with DAPI). The status of the joint >>> deliverable is still a possibility, just technically not agreed upon >>> as of yet. It may be best to reword this to state that the >>> possibility still exists, so those not in attendance don't get the >>> idea that we agreed to a joint deliverable at the meeting. >> My recollection, which seems to be supported by the minutes, is that >> Chaals supported moving this to DAP, Google (collectively) wouldn't >> object to a joint deliverable, Maciej said Apple couldn't join DAP >> as-is but I don't recall issues with joint work. Rough consensus seemed >> to drift towards joint work. At the DAP meeting, where the notion of a >> joint deliverable was accepted, Jonas (amongst several others) >> specifically requested that this happen on a separate mailing list. So >> unless we are keen to rathole on politics I'd suggest we just go with >> that, no? An additional plus is that doing it jointly means we can >> start right now and not wait for WebApps to recharter. >> >> I'll have a joint TF proposal out here very soon. > > As the discussion on October 31 was ending, I asked if anyone objected > to a joint deliverable and no one did [1]. Given DAP is agreeable with > cooperating with WebApps on Web Intents, it seems like the most > expeditious and practical way forward is to create a list for related > discussions. Agreed. cheers -- Charles 'chaals' McCathieNevile Opera Software, Standards Group je parle français -- hablo español -- jeg kan litt norsk http://my.opera.com/chaals Try Opera: http://www.opera.com
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 13:46:42 UTC