- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:02:57 -0700
- To: Webapps WG <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi guys, Currently the spec contains the following sentence: "Conforming user agents must automatically abort a transaction at the end of the scope in which it was created, if an exception is propagated to that scope." This means that the following code: setTimeout(function() { doStuff(); throw "booo"; }, 10); function doStuff() { var trans = db.transaction(["store1"], IDBTransaction.READ_WRITE) trans.objectStore("store1").put({ some: "value" }, 5); } is supposed to abort the transaction. I.e. since the same callback (in this case a setTimeout callback) which created the transaction later on throws, the spec says to abort the transaction. This was something that we debated a long time ago, but my recollection was that we should not spec this behavior. It appears that this was never removed from the spec though. One reason that I don't think that we should spec this behavior is that it's extremely tedious and error prone to implement. At every point that an implementation calls into javascript, the implementation has to add code which checks if an exception was thrown and if so, check if any transactions were started, and if so abort them. I'd like to simply remove this sentence. Any objections? Note, this does *not* affect the aborting that happens if an exception is thrown during a "success" or "error" event handler. / Jonas
Received on Monday, 31 October 2011 22:04:02 UTC