- From: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:10:42 -0800
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Hi Arthur! I am a procedural n00b and apologize in advance if this is not exactly what you're looking for. Let's iterate and get it to the digestible point :) In the next few months, I'll be working on and refining (with the help of folks who are interested in the subject): 1) a detailed spec (I think it's called a working draft) for Web Components; 2) a Web Components explainer document, aimed at Web developers, outlining how the component model works in conversational prose and examples; 3) a comprehensive overview of goals, use cases, properties, reasoning, and methodology behind the component model. I expect that Web Components will completely supersed the XBL2 work and address all of the use cases that originally motivated development of XBL2. All work is currently happening at http://dglazkov.github.com/component-model/ and http://wiki.whatwg.org/index.php?title=Component_Model. As long as it doesn't slow me down, I am happy to adopt any procedural conventions or places to work in -- if it's helpful in making WebApps WG more coherent and beautiful. :DG< On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 5:28 AM, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > In the context of WebApps' rechartering, what are our plans and expectations > for XBL2 and Component modeling? For example, what do we want to stop (e.g. > move to WG Note); are there any new deliverable(s) we want to add? > > (I just noticed we are coming up on five years since the XBL2 CR was > published.) > > -AB > > On 11/8/11 12:37 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote: >> >> During the October 31 meeting, we discussed [1] various additions, changes >> and deletions for WebApps' current charter [2]. To consolidate the various >> proposals, I created the following doc: >> >> <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/wiki/CharterChanges> >> >> My expectation is that Doug will this information when he drafts our >> updated charter. >> >> Comments on this doc and our future charter welcome. However, if we are >> going to add any new deliverables, I think there should be broad agreement >> on the spec, including prior commitment to drive the spec through all of the >> phases of the process including testing and implementations. >> >> Chaals, IanF - I included some actions/questions for you (mostly recorded >> at the f2f meeting). >> >> -AB >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/2011/10/31-webapps-minutes.html >> [2] http://www.w3.org/2010/webapps/charter/ >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 18:11:11 UTC