- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:34:53 +0000
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com, Art.Barstow@nokia.com, tlr@w3.org, marcosscaceres@gmail.com, schepers@w3.org, plh@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org, public-xmlsec@w3.org
On Wednesday, December 14, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 14 December 2011 at 21:06, Rigo Wenning wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > as the PAG chair of this XMLSEC PAG, let me tell you that support from the > > industry in sorting this out was low so far. What I heard through the > > grapevine was more or less: "We know, but we can't tell you". > > > > For the moment, W3C is asking for cost estimates to figure out what most of > > the members already know (as they have done the analysis on ECC long ago). > > Taking into account the complexity of the subject matter and also the delays > > due to messaging to the AC etc, I'm rather pessimistic about a quick > > resolution. > > > That's fine. That just makes for a stronger case to put to the Director (or for doing what Artb suggested, and moving the ECC to a future version of XML Dig Sig). FYI, document is ready to be published as REC: http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/ -- Marcos Caceres
Received on Thursday, 15 December 2011 14:43:03 UTC