Re: Synchronous postMessage for Workers?

On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 6:05 PM, David Levin <levin@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:07 PM, David Levin <levin@chromium.org> wrote:
>> > It seems like this mechanism would deadlock a worker if two workers send
>> > each other a synchronous message.
>>
>> Indeed. We can only allow child workers to block on parent workers.
>> Never the other way around.
>
> So the api would have to know who is listening to the other end of the port
> and throw if it isn't a parent?

I'm not convinced that we can do this with ports in a sane manner.
Only on dedicated workers. There you always know who is listening on
the other end. I.e. only on the DedicatedWorkerGlobalScope/Worker
interfaces.

/ Jonas

Received on Friday, 18 November 2011 02:42:14 UTC