Re: Is BlobBuilder needed?

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:
> The new API is smaller and simpler. Less to implement and less for web
> developers to understand. If it can meet all our use-cases without
> significant performance problems, then it's a win and we should do it.
>
> For line-endings, you could have the Blob constructor also take an optional
> endings argument:
> new Blob(String|Array|Blob|ArrayBuffer data, [optional] String contentType,
> [optional] String endings);

I believe (or at least, I maintain) that we're trying to do
dictionaries for this sort of thing.  Multiple optional arguments are
*horrible* unless they are truly, actually, order-dependent such that
you wouldn't ever specify a later one without already specifying a
former one.

~TJ

Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2011 19:58:04 UTC