- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:13:38 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Cameron McCormack" <cmccormack@mozilla.com>
- Cc: arun@mozilla.com, "Adrian Bateman" <adrianba@microsoft.com>, "Arthur Barstow" <art.barstow@nokia.com>, "Jonas Sicking" <sicking@mozilla.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Tue, 04 Oct 2011 10:37:41 +0200, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: > Another option which just occurred to me is to actually use > DOMException objects. The ECMAScript error objects don't actually have > anything "exception specific" about them. DOMException only does so by > name of the interface. > > Either way is fine with me. DOMException is also not an "interface" in IDL terms, it's an "exception". It would be great if Cameron could weigh in here as either way is fine with me too. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 09:14:26 UTC