- From: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 15:01:55 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Daniel Cheng <dcheng@chromium.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 22:02:29 UTC
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Daniel Cheng <dcheng@chromium.org> wrote: > > For technical reasons, animating the drag image is non-trivial and not > > likely to be implemented in the near future, if it is ever implemented. > > I would think that it's basically identical, technically, to > implementing the element() function from CSS Image Values, which I > believe we're planning to do. > Not quite. With the element() function the 'live copy' still lives in the page and renders the same way everything else does. My understanding (and Daniel can correct me if I'm wrong) is that drag images do not render the same way due to platform integration concerns and so the technical cost for the two is fairly different. - James > ~TJ > >
Received on Friday, 7 October 2011 22:02:29 UTC