Re: [DRAFT] Web Intents Task Force Charter

On Thursday, 10 November 2011 at 22:53, timeless wrote:

> #2 is obviously more exciting for vendors trying to proxy to non web
> things, but IMO that's an implementation detail or potentially a
> supplemental Note/Specification.

Agreed. 

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Received on Thursday, 10 November 2011 23:07:13 UTC