- From: Phil Booth <pmbooth@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:40:03 +0000
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Joćo Eiras <joaoe@opera.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAN40wRMH4X=QCrwtwzZzSam_RieL2L12V36=RiXF_O7uqkhdHQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 23 November 2011 18:23, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > have lying around everywhere. Right now, authors in general have zero > awareness of XPath, so recognizing it would be effectively "adding" > it. > Not sure how much my opinion is worth in all this but, as a developer that has non-zero awareness of XPath, I just wanted to chime in at this point. It depends on your definition of "in general" of course, but the following could be construed as evidence to the contrary (there are some false positives in here, I realise): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/183369/cross-browser-xpath-implementation-in-javascript http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=xpath+javascript http://www.google.com/codesearch#search/&q=preceding-sibling%20lang :^javascript$%20case:yes&type=cs http://www.google.com/codesearch#search/&q=descendant-or-self%20lang :^javascript$%20case:yes&type=cs http://goog-ajaxslt.sourceforge.net/ http://www.google.com/codesearch#search/&q=ajaxslt.*\.js http://www.google.com/codesearch#search/&q=xpath.*\.js http://chris-nielsen.blogspot.com/2009/12/xpath-axis-selectors-implemented-in.html http://mcc.id.au/xpathjs http://www.dashop.de/blog/en/dev/JavaScript/content/XPath/JavaScript-XPath-Implementation.html http://www.codestore.net/store.nsf/unid/BLOG-20050420 http://www.ahristov.com/tutorial/javascript-tips/Browser%2Bindependant%2BXPath%2Bevaluation.html http://goessner.net/articles/JsonPath/ http://js-xpath.sourceforge.net/ http://www.w3schools.com/xpath/ https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Introduction_to_using_XPath_in_JavaScript http://programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/117399/xpath-vs-dom-api
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2011 15:07:46 UTC