Re: Call for Contributors: TAG's Web App Storage work [Was: Re: TAG Comment on Web Storage]

Hi Mark:
The idea is to involve some of those folks in this effort.
All the best, Ashok

On 11/23/2011 2:49 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> What effect will this effort have on the implementations? Are they listening?
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> On 23/11/2011, at 11:49 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Off-list, Ashok and I talked about his comments and TAG's Web Application Storage work [1]. Ashok would welcome WebApps' participation in that work. Thus, for the WebApps group - this is call for contributors.
>>
>> If you are interested in contributing to this area, please respond to this e-mail (off-list responses are fine too).
>>
>> -Art Barstow
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/sum10#webappstorage
>>
>> On 11/21/11 2:14 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
>>> On 11/20/11 8:33 PM, ext ashok malhotra wrote:
>>>> The idea is not to remove APIs.
>>>>
>>>> We have several client-side storage facilities that cover different but overlapping
>>>> usecases.  Can we step back and look at what we have and come up, perhaps, with a
>>>> smaller set of facilities and better coordinated APIs.
>>> If this is important to the TAG, it seems like you should add that task to the "Web Application Storage" work the TAG intends to do. Agreed?
>>>
>>> -AB
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2011/sum10#webappstorage
>>>
>>>
>>>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   http://www.mnot.net/
>
>
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 23:10:00 UTC