Re: QSA, the problem with ":scope", and naming

On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> * Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> >> >Did you not understand my example?  el.find("+ foo, + bar") feels
> >> >really weird and I don't like it.  I'm okay with a single selector
> >> >starting with a combinator, like el.find("+ foo"), but not a selector
> >> >list.
> >>
> >> Allowing "+ foo" but not "+ foo, + bar" would be "really weird".
> >
> > Tab, what specifically is weird about el.find("+ foo, + bar")?
>
> Seeing a combinator immediately after a comma just seems weird to me.
> This may just be a personal prejudice.


With my web developer hat on, I would expect the selector list version to
just be a comma-separated list of any valid single selectors. We should
either allow it in both cases or neither IMO. My preference is to allow it.

Ojan