Re: [Selectors API 2] Is matchesSelector stable enough to unprefix in implementations? from Yehuda Katz on 2011-11-23 (public-webapps@w3.org from October to December 2011)

From: Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:33:37 -0800
To: Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
Message-ID: <CAMFeDTXKjmd-DGRrheCvo1+vXVKvT2ErVd8W6w0Ma0_KVw9pAg@mail.gmail.com>

Works for me. I can live with .matches, but .matchesSelector is too verbose.

Yehuda Katz
(ph) 718.877.1325


On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Aryeh Gregor <ayg@aryeh.name> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I like .is, the name jQuery uses for this purpose. Any reason not to go
> with
> > it?
>
> We might want it for something else.  .matches clearly sounds like
> it's selector-related, and I have more trouble thinking of another
> meaning we'd ever really want for it.
>

Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2011 18:34:26 UTC