- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:21:11 +0100
- To: "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "Glenn Adams" <glenn@skynav.com>
- Cc: "WebApps WG" <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 19:51:48 +0100, Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com> wrote: > If the answer is that no item() method is implied, then does the use of > sequence<T> in these newer specs entail dropping this method (with > respect to prior DOM specs)? The DOM specifications probably need to move back to using interface rather than sequence. I was hoping sequence would define the whole collection thing magically, but it never turned out that way. Still not quite sure what the real use case is for sequence. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 11 December 2011 12:24:11 UTC