Re: Indexed database API autoIncrement

On Sunday, November 13, 2011, Shawn Wilsher <me@shawnwilsher.com> wrote:
> On 10/23/2011 3:04 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> Good catch! This definitely needs to be specified in the spec.
>>
>> I have a weak preference for using 1. This has a smaller risk of
>> triggering edge cases in the client code since it's always truthy.
>> I.e. if someone tries to detect the presence of an id, they won't fail
>> due to the id being 0.
>
> Looks like there was a [loose] consensus around one, but it's not
specified as far as I can tell.  Should I file a bug or will it get
magically fixed with this e-mail?

Please file bug.

/ Jonas