- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:30:27 +0100
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: public-webapps@w3.org, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
On 2011-11-22 14:09, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 11/22/11 8:05 AM, Lachlan Hunt wrote: >> The current draft of Selectors 4 includes :matches(), though, which can >> partially handle that case, excluding :not([type]), which would have to >> be left separate. > > That seems like a bug in :matches() that just needs fixing if it's meant > as a replacement for :any(). Actually, I'm mistaken. The spec says that :matches() can't be used within :not(), rather than the other way around. -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 13:31:04 UTC