- From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 18:28:12 -0700
- To: Art.Barstow@nokia.com
- Cc: nrm@arcanedomain.com, public-webapps@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org, w3c@adambarth.com
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 01:29:05 UTC
Perhaps. But widely implemented does not necessarily imply widely used. In any case, support for or use of a feature of a WD or CR does not imply it must be present in REC. On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:21 PM, <Art.Barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > >* From:* ext Glenn Adams [glenn@skynav.com] > *> * > > Could you quantify "widely"? > > I think this definition of "widely used" is useful for this context: > http://caniuse.com/#search=storage > > Personally, I see little to negative value in ignoring the fact the > "ship has sailed" for this spec. > > -AB > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com> wrote: > >> These APIs are quite widely used on the web. It seems unlikely that >> we'll be able to delete either of them in favor of a single facility. >> >>
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2011 01:29:05 UTC