- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 15:22:23 +0000
- To: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
- Cc: Art.Barstow@nokia.com, public-xmlsec@w3.org, tlr@w3.org, public-webapps@w3.org, rigo@w3.org
On Thursday, 29 December 2011 at 14:11, Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com wrote:
> As I said before, this action is premature and we should let the PAG conclude (or at least wait for a status report) - the W3C Team may have more to say, but if this is on the order of weeks I do not think making work here to have apparent progress is useful. I have not seen a definitive statement from the ECC PAG chair.
That's fine. I guess as long as we don't have to wait one or two years (and I say that with a serious face!).
> Did you read the message from Brian LaMacchia? If not, please read it, as it provides additional argument against this proposed change.
Pointer please?
> I am against revising XML Signature 1.1 until I understand the actual PAG status and until we have XML Security WG agreement. This endless email debate is not helpful and I'm not sure I understand the urgency related to widgets apart from a desire to mark it as complete.
The urgency is just that (getting it to Rec).
But academically, the other arguments that were made are valid. Those were:
* a /latest/ location
* decupling algorithms, etc, from processing.
--
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Thursday, 29 December 2011 15:23:05 UTC