- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 00:49:25 +0000
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
On Wednesday, 7 December 2011 at 00:47, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On 12/6/11 7:01 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > > I'm also concerned at use of the terms "limited" and "very limited" to label "current implementations" as being both subjective and relativistic - and it implies that attempts to implement have ceased; particularly next to "well deployed", "Largely deployed", "Growing", and "Getting deployed". Either remove that column, or present some data to which you can underpin each of the labels. > > > > Yes, more objective data would be good; perhaps just point to some > source like CanIUse? I guess that also raises the question about where caniuse is getting their data from? And how they keep it up to date? (might have a good answer, just have not looked at that site in a while) -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 00:50:02 UTC