- From: Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 04:52:14 -0700
- To: public-webapps@w3.org, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
As further input on this proposed discussion, please see the unofficial draft of the "EventSource API Connectionless Push Extension" at http://bkaj.net/w3c/eventsource-push.html. Hopefully webapps will have at least 30 minutes open in the schedule for Tuesday so I can introduce this API draft proposal, and we can discuss the other alternatives noted below. Comments are welcome. Bryan Sullivan On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Bryan Sullivan <blsaws@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Art and Chaals, > > If possible (depending upon the Webapps agenda fullness) I would like > to propose a 30-60 minute discussion on followup work we have been > pursuing on extending Server-Sent Events for support of Connectionless > Push, as noted in the current SSE draft (the section > http://dev.w3.org/html5/eventsource/#eventsource-push, which resulted > from the last discussion we had on this in Webapps in the 2009 TPAC). > If there is time for this (at least 30 minutes) I can send info in > advance tomorrow, which will describe some approaches we have been > considering, including: > - adding support for additional URI schemes for eventsource, to > indicate additional bearers ("sources") for eventsource events > - processing of events from connectionless Push bearers (SMS, OMA > Push/SMS, and OMA Push in general) using the text/event-stream > processing model > - alternatively, using device-local eventsource server addresses as a > way to seamlessly extend eventsource for these additional bearers, > without impacting the browser > - any other ideas that Webapps members might have on how this can be > achieved with as much consistency with eventsource as possible (even > complete transparency, if possible) > > This would be in essence a kickoff discussion of this in Webapps, if > the group overall thinks any of the ideas are well-formed enough to > pursue in some spec form.Otherwise the feedback would be useful > anyway, to help improve the API extension concepts and prototypes we > have been developing for submission to Webapps at the right time. > > -- > Thanks, > Bryan Sullivan > -- Thanks, Bryan Sullivan
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 11:52:47 UTC