- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:21:04 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Erik Arvidsson <arv@chromium.org>
- cc: Roland Steiner <rolandsteiner@google.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-webapps@w3.org, Dominic Cooney <dominicc@google.com>, Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
On Mon, 10 Oct 2011, Erik Arvidsson wrote: > > Splitting this up into two different things is great. > > Allowing attaching an alternative shadow tree through CSS but disabling > any JS to be run seems like the right thing to do. You wouldn't want to disable any JS. Just the API defining aspects. > I'm also in favor of the "is" attribute. Even though I think that > <x-foo> is more readable than <div is="foo"> it is hard to argue about > the issues regarding parsing and fallback behavior. The "is" attribute > also provides a better behavior for common cases such as when you want > to extend <select> and <button>. Agreed. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 00:24:51 UTC