On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 14:19, Yehuda Katz <wycats@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yehuda Katz > (ph) 718.877.1325 > > > On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote: > >> On 11/21/11 11:31 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> >>> 1) Make sense. >>>> 2) Not break existing content. >>>> 3) Be short. >>>> >>> >>> .matches >>> .is >>> >> > I like .is, the name jQuery uses for this purpose. Any reason not to go > with it? > IMHO 'is' seems awfully broad in meaning and doesn't very well indicate that the parameter should be a selector. Inasmuch I like .matches better. Also, FWIW, an 'is' attribute on elements was/is in discussion on this ML as one possibility to specify components. Cheers, - Roland
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 08:15:14 UTC