On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Israel Hilerio wrote: > > We believe it is simpler and closer to the intent on the WebIDL spec to > say: Throws a DOMException of type " VersionError". > > Instead of having to explain what it means to throw a type as an > exception: To throw a “VersionError” exception, a user agent would > construct a DOMException exception whose type is " VersionError " and > code exception field value is 0, and actually throw that object as an > exception. If you use WebIDL directly, don't forget to specify the value for the 'code' and 'message' attributes of the exception object. (The reason I made the HTML spec use the DOM Core definition here is that it takes care of all the various features of DOMException so I don't have to worry about them at all.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Monday, 3 October 2011 19:54:46 UTC