Thursday, 31 March 2011
- [Bug 12233] We should add a method to compare two IndxedDB keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- [Bug 11269] Evaluating keyPaths needs to be better specified
- RE: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- RE: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: Mail List Etiquette [Was: WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?]
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Mail List Etiquette [Was: WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?]
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- [Bug 9832] keyPath is underspecified
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- [WebSQL] Any future plans, or has IndexedDB replaced WebSQL?
- Re: SearchBox API
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- RfC: WebApps Testing Process
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
Wednesday, 30 March 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- clarification on 9.1.3
- Re: [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
- [Bug 12366] IDBSuccessEvent is not defined anywhere, yet it is used (remove it)
Tuesday, 29 March 2011
- [Bug 10585] Need an error to indicate that the user disallowed access
- Re: websockets protocol getting solid - cross-reviews; deadline April 15
- Re: websockets protocol getting solid - cross-reviews?
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- websockets protocol getting solid - cross-reviews?
- CfC: new WD of Clipboard API and Events; deadline April 5
- Re: How many ways to save store app data?
- [FileAPI] Result of calling MultipleReads on FileReader
Monday, 28 March 2011
- Re: SearchBox API
- Re: SearchBox API
- [widgets] Widget Updates tests?
- How many ways to save store app data?
Sunday, 27 March 2011
Saturday, 26 March 2011
- Re: clipboard data types registry?
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
Thursday, 24 March 2011
Saturday, 26 March 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
Thursday, 24 March 2011
- [Bug 11673] Streaming audio data from a microphone over a WebSocket
- [Bug 12190] I think this will become useless because it need server to run. Kaazing.com is selling the server. Unless there is an open source server where people can use. Then it will become popular.
- [Bug 12180] give the name of url to download the Jetty server
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
Wednesday, 23 March 2011
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Re: Offline Web Applications status
- Offline Web Applications status
- bug in example in step 6 of media type algorithm in WD-widgets-20110322 ?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- RE: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- RE: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
Tuesday, 22 March 2011
- RE: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- [Bug 12366] New: IDBCuccessEvent is not defined anywhere, yet it is used
- RE: [IndexedDB] Any particular reason built-in properties are not indexable?
- [widget] Fixed some tests in Widget Interface test suite
- [widgets] New draft of P&C
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
- clipboard data types registry?
Monday, 21 March 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Any particular reason built-in properties are not indexable?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Any particular reason built-in properties are not indexable?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Any particular reason built-in properties are not indexable?
- [IndexedDB] Any particular reason built-in properties are not indexable?
- Re: SearchBox API
- Re: SearchBox API
- [FYI] W3C Workshop: Identity in the Browser; Position Paper deadline 22 April
- Re: [public-webapps] SearchBox API
- Re: [webkit-dev] SearchBox API
Sunday, 20 March 2011
- Re: SearchBox API
- [IndexedDB] Design Flaws: Not Stateless, Not Treating Objects As Opaque
- Re: SearchBox API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
Saturday, 19 March 2011
- SearchBox API
- [Bug 12340] New: It is not clear which worker to use when using nameless SharedWorker
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
Friday, 18 March 2011
- RE: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
- RE: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: [Bug 12321] New: Add compound keys to IndexedDB
- Re: [Bug 12321] New: Add compound keys to IndexedDB
- Re: [Bug 12321] New: Add compound keys to IndexedDB
- Re: [Bug 12321] New: Add compound keys to IndexedDB
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: [Bug 12321] New: Add compound keys to IndexedDB
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: [Bug 12321] New: Add compound keys to IndexedDB
- Re: [Bug 12321] New: Add compound keys to IndexedDB
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
Thursday, 17 March 2011
- Re: [admin] TPAC2011 Oct 31-Nov 4 in Santa Clara
- RE: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: Indexed Database API
- RE: Indexed Database API
- Re: [XHR2] final progress events
- Re: [XHR2] final progress events
- [XHR2] final progress events
- Re: [widgets] CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Widget P&C; deadline March 15
- Re: ES I18N participation (was: Re: Minor comments on Widgets)
- ES I18N participation (was: Re: Minor comments on Widgets)
- RE: Minor comments on Widgets
- [XHR2] load events on XMHttpRequestUpload
- Re: Minor comments on Widgets
- [admin] TPAC2011 Oct 31-Nov 4 in Santa Clara
- Re: Minor comments on Widgets
- Re: Minor comments on Widgets
- Re: Minor comments on Widgets
- Re: Minor comments on Widgets
- Re: Minor comments on Widgets
- Re: Minor comments on Widgets
- Re: Minor comments on Widgets
- Re: Minor comments on Widgets
- [IndexedDB] Enabling multiple values in a single index to correspond to a single ObjectStore entry
- Re: File API and Directory API feedback
Wednesday, 16 March 2011
- Re: File API and Directory API feedback
- [Bug 12321] New: Add compound keys to IndexedDB
- Re: File API and Directory API feedback
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- CfC: to publish WG Note of HTTP Caching and Serving spec; deadline March 20
- RE: Minor comments on Widgets
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
Tuesday, 15 March 2011
- Re: drop directories/folders
- Re: Indexed Database API
- [Bug 12310] New: We should add IDBCursor.advance(number of items to move forward)
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
- Minor comments on Widgets
Monday, 14 March 2011
Tuesday, 15 March 2011
- drop directories/folders
- Re: [XHR2] timeout
- [Bug 11673] Streaming audio data from a microphone over a WebSocket
- RE: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline March 7
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
Monday, 14 March 2011
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
- Re: API for matrix manipulation
- API for matrix manipulation
Sunday, 13 March 2011
Saturday, 12 March 2011
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
Friday, 11 March 2011
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Component Model Should Use DOM Object Inheritance
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline April 21
- RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Server-sent Events; deadline April 21
- RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events; deadline June 1
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
Thursday, 10 March 2011
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Fwd: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Re: Component Model is not an Isolation Model
- Component Model is not an Isolation Model
Wednesday, 9 March 2011
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline March 7
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- [Bug 12272] New: Improve section on DNS spoofing attacks to address user attacks
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline March 7
- RE: publish Last Call Working Draft of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline March 14
- RE: to stop work on Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving spec; deadline March 10
- RE: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline March 7
- RE: publish Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events spec; deadline March 7
- Re: Moving XBL et al. forward
- Moving XBL et al. forward
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Widget URI tests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- RE: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
Tuesday, 8 March 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: [IndexedDB] What should be allowed as a key path?
- [Bug 11257] Should IDBCursor.update be able to create a new entry?
- Re: CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline March 14
- [Bug 11564] Remove all references to manually populated indexes
- [Bug 11097] [IndexedDB] Behavior of .close() is not completely specified
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
Monday, 7 March 2011
Tuesday, 8 March 2011
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- RfC: Last Call Working Draft of Ontology for Media Resource 1.0; deadline March 31
- 2nd Last Call Working Draft Transition announcement of the Ontology for Media Resource 1.0
- RE: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: [widget] proposal to add defaultlocale attribute to widget element (P&C Spec), I18N ACTION-18
- [widgets] CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Widget P&C; deadline March 15
- Re: minor comment about file extensions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- [IndexedDB] What should be allowed as a key path?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- [Bug 11164] There is no way to get from an error event to other objectStores
- [Bug 11553] Ensure indexedDBSync is on the right worker interface
- [Bug 9796] IndexedDB's async interface should be available within workers
- [Bug 11351] [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- [Bug 11396] Add a callback to IDBDatabaseSync.transaction
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- [Bug 10000] Allow expressions in addition to keyPaths when creating indexes
- [Bug 11528] We should add some form of dynamic transaction to IndexedDB
- [Bug 11976] Autoincrement keys need to be cleaned up some in the spec
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- [Bug 11747] openCursor's text contradicts itself
- [Bug 12261] Update cursor API
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- [Bug 11375] [IndexedDB] Error codes need to be assigned new numbers
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- [Bug 11376] IDBObjectStore.put's DATA_ERR description needs clarification
- [Bug 11394] We should throw if continue() is called with a key <= the current position
- [Bug 12016] After page unload, all IDBDatabases attached to the document should have .close() called on them
- [Bug 12114] Blocked setVersion transactions should be aborted when their database is closed
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- [Bug 11948] index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- [Bug 11398] [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object
Monday, 7 March 2011
- Re: Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- Using ArrayBuffer as payload for binary data to/from Web Workers
- [Bug 12261] New: Update cursor API
- [Bug 11567] IndexedDB should utilize the new WebIDL static feature
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of HTML5 Web Messaging; deadline March 14
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- RE: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
Saturday, 5 March 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: Indexed Database API
- Re: Indexed Database API
Friday, 4 March 2011
- Re: Indexed Database API
- Re: Indexed Database API
- Re: Indexed Database API
- Re: Indexed Database API
- Re: Indexed Database API
- Re: Indexed Database API
- [Bug 11914] .objectStore should be added to IDBIndex and .source to IDBCursor
- Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: FormData questions
- Re: [XHR2] FormData for <form>
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- [DOMCore] Please use www-dom
- Re: Some additions to Web Workers
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
Friday, 4 March 2011
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
- Some additions to Web Workers
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
- [Bug 11978] Section: Abstract Problem: "this specification defines two mecahism for..." should read "mechanisms".
- [Bug 12234] New: [IndexedDB] Integrate with the HTML5 event loop
- [Bug 11348] [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
Thursday, 3 March 2011
- [Bug 12229] When a IDBKeyRange.bound's lower param is greater than the upper one, we probably should throw some exception
- [Bug 12233] New: We should add a method to compare two IndxedDB keys
- CfC: to stop work on Programmable HTTP Caching and Serving spec; deadline March 10
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: [postmsg] Is HTML5 Web Messaging ready for Last Call Working Draft?
- Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: [whatwg] set input.value when input element has composition string
- Re: [whatwg] set input.value when input element has composition string
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- [Bug 12229] New: When a IDBKeyRange.bound's lower param is greater than the upper one, we probably should throw some exception
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events spec; deadline March 7
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Progress Events spec; deadline March 7
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: [whatwg] set input.value when input element has composition string
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
Tuesday, 1 March 2011
- Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
- [eventsource] Event names
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
- Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
- Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- [IndexedDB] Two Real World Use-Cases
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: set input.value when input element has composition string
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Cross-Origin Resource Embedding Restrictions
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
Monday, 28 February 2011
- Re: [whatwg] Intent of the FileSystem API
- [Bug 12206] Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're t
- [Bug 12206] New: Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're t
- [postmsg] Is HTML5 Web Messaging ready for Last Call Working Draft?
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- RE: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- [eventsource] Connection close on EventSource collection
- CfC: publish Last Call Working Draft of Web Workers; deadline March 7
- CfC: publish Last Call Working draft of Server-sent Events; deadline March 7
- Re: set input.value when input element has composition string
- [Bug 12202] <html> <head> <link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="img/icons/iphone_icon.png"/> <link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='http://uni104.tr.ogame.org/game/css/01style.css' media='screen' /> <link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href=
- Re: [XHR2] Readability of Async/Sync in xhr.open
- Re: [XHR2] Readability of Async/Sync in xhr.open
Sunday, 27 February 2011
- Re: [XHR2] Readability of Async/Sync in xhr.open
- [Bug 12202] New: <html> <head> <link rel="apple-touch-icon" href="img/icons/iphone_icon.png"/> <link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href='http://uni104.tr.ogame.org/game/css/01style.css' media='screen' /> <link rel='stylesheet' type='text/css' href=
- [XHR2] Readability of Async/Sync in xhr.open
Saturday, 26 February 2011
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- RE: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
Friday, 25 February 2011
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- [Bug 12190] New: I think this will become useless because it need server to run. Kaazing.com is selling the server. Unless there is an open source server where people can use. Then it will become popular.
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- WebPerformance WG and Visibility API, Yield and Continue, requestAnimationFrame
- [workers], [eventsource] Re: several messages
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- [Bug 12180] New: give the name of url to download the Jetty server
- Re: [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- RE: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: several messages
- Re: several messages
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- [Bug 12179] New: We should spec the order in which version change events fire
- RE: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- [Bug 11552] We should remove timeout from IndexedDB.
- [Bug 10381] [IndexedDB] Structured clones should be created synchronously
Thursday, 24 February 2011
- Binary data in WebSockets API (was RE: [Bug 12102] New: WebSocket protocol update time)
- Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: [FileAPI] FileError and FileException should be available in workers
- Re: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- Re: [workers] Moving the Web Workers spec back to Last Call WD
- Re: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- RE: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- RE: Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Overview of W3C technologies for mobile Web applications
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- [FileAPI] FileError and FileException should be available in workers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- [DOMCore] fire and dispatch
- Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
- RE: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: [IndexedDB] success/error events
- Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
Wednesday, 23 February 2011
- [IndexedDB] success/error events
- CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2
Tuesday, 22 February 2011
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- Re: Status of Selectors API Level 1 Candidate
- [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
Monday, 21 February 2011
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- Re: [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
- [XHR2] Feedback on sec-* headers
Sunday, 20 February 2011
- Re: [DOMCore] Element.childElementCount
- Re: [DOMCore] Rename to "DOM Core"?
- [DOMCore] Element.childElementCount
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
Saturday, 19 February 2011
Friday, 18 February 2011
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- [Bug 12124] jhjhju fsd fdsf sdfdsfsdfsdf sdf sdf sdf sd sdfdsfdsf sdf dsfdsf sdf
- [Bug 12124] New: jhjhju fsd fdsf sdfdsfsdfsdf sdf sdf sdf sd sdfdsfdsf sdf dsfdsf sdf
- Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
- [Bug 12118] tyutyuty dgdg ddfg ddf dgf d
- [Bug 12118] New: tyutyuty dgdg ddfg ddf dgf d
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- [IndexedDB] Spec changes for international language support
- Re: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)
- [Bug 12114] New: Blocked setVersion transactions should be aborted when their database is closed
Thursday, 17 February 2011
- RE: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)
- Re: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)
- Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()
- Re: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)
- Re: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)
- Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()
- Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()
- Re: [webstorage] Moving Web Storage back to Last Call WD
- [Bug 12111] New: spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match implementation behavior
- Re: [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)
- [IndexedDB] More questions about IDBRequests always firing (WAS: Reason for aborting transactions)
- [Bug 11483] What should selectionStart/End return when there is no selection and no cursor? e.g. display:none
- [Bug 12102] New: WebSocket protocol update time
Wednesday, 16 February 2011
- [Bug 12092] Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're t
- [Bug 11818] As documented in the "Creating workers" section, a worker *must* be an external script. This prevents developing or deploying code that uses Web Workers as a single page app, which is often quite handy. Could this restriction be lifted?
- [FileAPI] readAsDataURL()
- [Bug 12092] New: Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're t
- [Bug 11385] Bring the sync APIs back in sync with the async ones
Tuesday, 15 February 2011
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- [Bug 12090] New: WEB STORAGE It would be nice to have one Storage object that you could place wherever you want. You could simply set a parameter "local" or define it as "shared" and set path to the server (e.g. "http://www.mysite/shared_storage"). Cheers, Cam camoken@gm
- minor comment about file extensions
- Re: [File API: Directories and System] callbacks or events
- Seeking pre-LCWD comments for Progress Events spec; deadline March 1
- [Bug 11439] Extend ProgressEvent with position and totalSize attributes
- Re: [File API: Directories and System] callbacks or events
- Re: [DOMCore] Rename to "DOM Core"?
- Re: Testing Requirements
- [DOMCore] Ms2ger is co-editor
- [DOMCore] Rename to "DOM Core"?
- [DOMCore] Added Events
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: Testing Requirements
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- RE: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- [Bug 11770] test tx.executeSql("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ToDo", [], function(result){}, function(tx, error){}); tx.executeSql("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ToDo", [], function(result){}, function(tx, error){}); tx.executeSql("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ToDo", [], function(result){},
- [Bug 11769] I have just implemented a 'javascript sandbox' using iframes and postMessage, exactly as intended by the specification. Thank you! It works beautifully! Safe XSS at last! Of course, now the next problem comes into view: I have all these IFrames/Objects wi
Monday, 14 February 2011
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- [Bug 12067] New: Improve error handling in workers
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- Re: [workers] Moving the Web Workers spec back to Last Call WD
- Re: [webstorage] Moving Web Storage back to Last Call WD
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
Saturday, 12 February 2011
- Re: [webstorage] Moving Web Storage back to Last Call WD
- [workers] Moving the Web Workers spec back to Last Call WD
- [webstorage] Moving Web Storage back to Last Call WD
- [eventsource] Moving Server-sent Events spec back to Last Call
- Re: File API and Directory API feedback
Friday, 11 February 2011
- Re: File API and Directory API feedback
- Re: [File API: Directories and System] callbacks or events
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- [File API: Directories and System] callbacks or events
- Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
- Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
- Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
- Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
- Re: Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
- Proposal: Navigation of JSON documents with html-renderer-script link relation
- Re: File API and Directory API feedback
- [Bug 12032] <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <title>zzz</title> <script src="modernizr.min.js"></script> </head> <body> <script> function supports_canvas() { return !!document.createElement('canvas').getCantext; } </script> </body> </html>
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- [Bug 12032] New: <!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <title>zzz</title> <script src="modernizr.min.js"></script> </head> <body> <script> function supports_canvas() { return !!document.createElement('canvas').getCantext; } </script> </body> </html>
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: File API and Directory API feedback
- Re: File API and Directory API feedback
Thursday, 10 February 2011
- File API and Directory API feedback
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- [Bug 12027] 呵呵呵 as these tend to change rapidly and make your feedback hard
- RE: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- [Bug 12027] New: 呵呵呵 as these tend to change rapidly and make your feedback hard
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
Wednesday, 9 February 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- RE: [widget] proposal to add defaultlocale attribute to widget element (P&C Spec), I18N ACTION-18
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
Tuesday, 8 February 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Fullscreen API
- Re: Fullscreen API
- [Bug 12016] New: After page unload, all IDBDatabases attached to the document should have .close() called on them
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: Fullscreen API
- Re: Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [widgets] Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Mouse Capture for Canvas
- Re: Fullscreen API
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: Widgets - WARP, Widgets Updates and Digital Signatures
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Fullscreen API
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: FormData questions
- Re: [XHR2] FormData for <form>
- [IndexedDB] setVersion blocked on uncollected garbage IDBDatabases
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
Monday, 7 February 2011
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- [Bug 11669] Section: "Parsing an event stream" It looks like their is a mistake in this ABNF description, "end-of-line" is repeated: stream = [ bom ] *event event = *( comment / field ) end-of-line comment = colon *any-char end-of-line field
- Re: [widgets] New Widget Update Types: Kill Switch and Patch
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [widgets] New Widget Update Types: Kill Switch and Patch
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- Re: [widgets] New Widget Update Types: Kill Switch and Patch
- Re: [widgets] New Widget Update Types: Kill Switch and Patch
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
Sunday, 6 February 2011
- [widgets] New Widget Update Types: Kill Switch and Patch
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
- Re: [Bug 11351] New: [IndexedDB] Should we have a maximum key size (or something like that)?
Saturday, 5 February 2011
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: [Workers] NavigatorOnLine
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- [Bug 11987] cation changing out from under them in incompatible ways. Vendors interested in implementing this specification before it eventually reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage should join the aforementioned mailing lists and take part in the discussions.
- [Bug 11987] New: cation changing out from under them in incompatible ways. Vendors interested in implementing this specification before it eventually reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage should join the aforementioned mailing lists and take part in the discussions.
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
Friday, 4 February 2011
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- Re: [FileSystem]: URI format, uses
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- Re: [widgets] New version of P&C Ready for pub
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- [Bug 11947] [IndexedDB] Updating object stores with auto increment
- Re: [XHR] open method extension for TLS authentication
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- [Bug 11978] New: Section: Abstract Problem: "this specification defines two mecahism for..." should read "mechanisms".
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
Thursday, 3 February 2011
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
- Re: [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() fires both error and abort
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- [Bug 11976] New: Autoincrement keys need to be cleaned up some in the spec
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: [widgets] New version of P&C Ready for pub
- Re: [widgets] New version of P&C Ready for pub
- Re: [XHR] open method extension for TLS authentication
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Re: [XHR] open method extension for TLS authentication
- Re: [XHR2] content type of blobs passed to send()
- Re: progress events in sync XHR not entirely ruled out
- Re: Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
- Quota API to query/request quota for offline storages (e.g. IndexedDB, FileSystem)
Wednesday, 2 February 2011
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- [Bug 11966] New: Catrope's feedback
- [Bug 11965] tengo una duda respecto al uso de los webSockets
- [Bug 11965] New: tengo una duda respecto al uso de los webSockets
- Rechartering Device APIs & Policy Working Group
- Re: [widgets] Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
Tuesday, 1 February 2011
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- [Bug 11948] New: index.openCursor's cursor should have a way to access the index's "value" (in addition to the index's key and objectStore's value)
- [widgets] New version of P&C Ready for pub
- IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key
- [FileAPI] FileReader.abort() fires both error and abort
- [Bug 11947] New: [IndexedDB] Updating object stores with auto increment
- Re: [widgets] Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
- Re: [widgets] Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
Monday, 31 January 2011
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: [widgets] Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "
- Re: [widgets] Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "
- [widgets] Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "
- Re: [FileAPI: Directories and System] Some comments
- Re: [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: [FileAPI: Directories and System] Some comments
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- [FileAPI] Why is FileList a sequence?
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- [XHR2] ArrayBuffer support added
- Re: clipboard events
Sunday, 30 January 2011
Monday, 31 January 2011
Saturday, 29 January 2011
- [Bug 11918] ola snjsy a sasdsadv aaxcv
- [Bug 11919] aadsasdasdasdasdsadadasdad df df afdsfdsf asfadasd
- [Bug 11919] New: aadsasdasdasdasdsadadasdad df df afdsfdsf asfadasd
- [Bug 11918] New: ola snjsy a sasdsadv aaxcv
- [XHR2] content type of blobs passed to send()
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- Re: [Web Storage] A couple questions about the storage spec
Friday, 28 January 2011
- [IndexedDB] Reason for aborting transactions
- [Bug 11914] New: .objectStore should be added to IDBIndex and .source to IDBCursor
- [Bug 10691] [Selection] Specify extend method for Selection objects
- [Bug 11911] fully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really importa
- [Bug 11911] New: fully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really importa
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- [Bug 11908] testg wefe fwefwe fweefw few fefeefw ef
- [Bug 11908] New: testg wefe fwefwe fweefw few fefeefw ef
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
Thursday, 27 January 2011
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "
- Re: [widgets] W3C Widgets Digital Signatures implementer feedback
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
Wednesday, 26 January 2011
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: [Bug 11348] New: [IndexedDB] Overhaul of the event model
- Re: [widgets] W3C Widgets Digital Signatures implementer feedback
- Re: [XHR] Use of the term 'MIME type'
- Re: [XHR] Use of the term 'MIME type'
- [widgets] W3C Widgets Digital Signatures implementer feedback
- Re: clipboard events
Tuesday, 25 January 2011
- [Bug 11425] [IndexedDB] Transaction timeout parameter should probably be a double
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
Monday, 24 January 2011
- Re: What is happening with XBL?
- [Bug 11847] hich you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're trying to solve is. That's more imp
- Re: What is happening with XBL?
- [Bug 11847] New: hich you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're trying to solve is. That's more imp
- What is happening with XBL?
- Re: CfC: publish new WDs of Sever-sent Events, Workers and Storage
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
Sunday, 23 January 2011
- Re: [FileSystem]: URI format, uses
- Re: [FileSystem]: URI format, uses
- Re: [FileSystem]: URI format, uses
- [Bug 11615] save text from an editor in a file system
- Re: [FileSystem]: URI format, uses
- Re: An HTML5 logo
- Re: [DOMCore] takeChildNodes() method
- Re: An HTML5 logo
- [DOMCore]
- [DOMCore] takeChildNodes() method
- CfC: publish new WDs of Sever-sent Events, Workers and Storage
- Re: An HTML5 logo
- Re: An HTML5 logo
- RE: [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question
- Re: An HTML5 logo
Saturday, 22 January 2011
Friday, 21 January 2011
- [Bug 11836] New: Don't specify the transport, just specify API and protocol
- [FileSystem]: URI format, uses
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- [Bug 11835] New: Please do *not* require a same-origin restriction in user agents (as currently specified under "Security Considerations")! This cross-origin data leakage security issues have already been addressed by the CORS specification (http://www.w3.org/TR/cors/).
- [Bug 11834] New: API for send/receive of binary data? Current IETF protocol drafts have binary type. Consider typed arrays (ArrayBuffer).
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: Breaking up the widget specs? Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [Desktop-extensions-team] Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question
- Re: [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question
- Re: [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question
- [Bug 11827] [Workers] "connect" event interface type not defined
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- RE: [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question
- [Web Workers] Bug filed and general question
- [Bug 11827] New: [Workers] "connect" event interface type not defined
Thursday, 20 January 2011
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Breaking up the widget specs? Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Can we remove forminput and formchange events and related dispatch methods?
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Auto increment and spec inconsistency
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: The Emperor's New APIs: On the (In)Secure Usage of New Client-side Primitives
- Re: [IndexedDB] Compound and multiple keys
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Re: Proposal for a page visibility API
- Proposal for a page visibility API
- [Bug 11818] New: As documented in the "Creating workers" section, a worker *must* be an external script. This prevents developing or deploying code that uses Web Workers as a single page app, which is often quite handy. Could this restriction be lifted?
Wednesday, 19 January 2011
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- [Bug 11800] trtrt ef zrf sdf sdfsd fs gdfg dfg fdg dfg ffdgdf df gfdg dfg
- [Bug 11800] New: trtrt ef zrf sdf sdfsd fs gdfg dfg fdg dfg ffdgdf df gfdg dfg
- [Bug 11799] trtrt ef zrf sdf sdfsd fs gdfg dfg fdg dfg ffdgdf df gfdg dfg
- [Bug 11799] New: trtrt ef zrf sdf sdfsd fs gdfg dfg fdg dfg ffdgdf df gfdg dfg
Tuesday, 18 January 2011
Monday, 17 January 2011
- [IndexedDB] Auto increment and spec inconsistency
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- The Emperor's New APIs: On the (In)Secure Usage of New Client-side Primitives
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
Sunday, 16 January 2011
Saturday, 15 January 2011
- Re: [Bug 11770] New: test tx.executeSql...
- [Bug 11770] New: test tx.executeSql("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ToDo", [], function(result){}, function(tx, error){}); tx.executeSql("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ToDo", [], function(result){}, function(tx, error){}); tx.executeSql("SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ToDo", [], function(result){},
- [Bug 11769] New: I have just implemented a 'javascript sandbox' using iframes and postMessage, exactly as intended by the specification. Thank you! It works beautifully! Safe XSS at last! Of course, now the next problem comes into view: I have all these IFrames/Objects wi
Thursday, 13 January 2011
- Re: Bug reports from jessica.w3.org?
- [Bug 11747] New: openCursor's text contradicts itself
- Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object
- Re: file-system-api: filename restrictions
Wednesday, 12 January 2011
- Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object
- Re: file-system-api: filename restrictions
- Re: Bug reports from jessica.w3.org?
- Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object
- Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object
- Bug reports from jessica.w3.org?
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- [Bug 11743] salut je teste les websocket 123
- [Bug 11743] New: salut je teste les websocket 123
- [Bug 11740] vbvbcb dcbd fhfdh h hfgh fg h fgh hfg hfghfg hf
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- [Bug 10624] [Selection] Selection anchorNode/anchorOffset/focusNode/focusOffset do not match existing browser behaviour
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- [Bug 11740] New: vbvbcb dcbd fhfdh h hfgh fg h fgh hfg hfghfg hf
- Re: WebSocket question
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: file-system-api: filename restrictions
- Re: file-system-api: filename restrictions
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
Tuesday, 11 January 2011
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: file-system-api: filename restrictions
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- [Bug 11606] wanted: awareness of non-persistent web storage
- [Bug 11589] It is said that "Values can be any data type supported by the structured clone algorithm", but the algorithm is not described. In fact is it deeply buried in the HTML5 specification, open to fuzzy interpretations. Values are a fundamental part of any data
- [Bug 11581] Is there really need to drop http compability ? This will cause lot of troubles in some http-servers and browsers. This will force developers to use ugly hacks like flash/java based implementations. Is there any reason, wht not to create real robust http-
- Last Call for Navigation Timing API
- [Bug 11570] Can't find the posibility for user authentication by connecting to a websocket! Missing?
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- [Bug 11730] Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're t
- Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- [Bug 11730] New: Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're t
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- [Bug 11483] What should selectionStart/End return when there is no selection and no cursor? e.g. display:none
- Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app
Monday, 10 January 2011
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app
- Re: FileAPI use case: making an image downloading app
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- [Bug 11419] Local Storage Data Not Retained Between Sessions When Running Browser Locally
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [Bug 11398] New: [IndexedDB] Methods that take multiple optional parameters should instead take an options object
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- [Bug 11630] is. That's more important than the solution, in fact.
- Re: [IndexedDB] Events and requests
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
Sunday, 9 January 2011
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
Saturday, 8 January 2011
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
Friday, 7 January 2011
- Limited DOM in Web Workers
- Re: clipboard events spec and HTML5 spec - divide and conquer, but where?
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: clipboard events spec and HTML5 spec - divide and conquer, but where?
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
Thursday, 6 January 2011
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker
- Re: clipboard events spec and HTML5 spec - divide and conquer, but where?
- [XHR] open method extension for TLS authentication
- clipboard events spec and HTML5 spec - divide and conquer, but where?
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
Wednesday, 5 January 2011
- RE: clipboard events
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- [Bug 11665] Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're t
- [Bug 11656] niceECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScrip
- Re: [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- [widgets] Removed LocalizableString interface from Widgets API
- [Bug 11669] New: Section: "Parsing an event stream" It looks like their is a mistake in this ABNF description, "end-of-line" is repeated: stream = [ bom ] *event event = *( comment / field ) end-of-line comment = colon *any-char end-of-line field
Tuesday, 4 January 2011
- [Bug 11665] New: Please enter your feedback, carefully indicating the title of the section for which you are submitting feedback, quoting the text that's wrong today if appropriate. If you're suggesting a new feature, it's really important to say what the problem you're t
- Peepo.com review request, deadline 6 Jan
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- Re: clipboard events
- [XHR] Use of the term 'MIME type'
- Re: clipboard events
Monday, 3 January 2011
- Re: [IndexedDB] Why rely on run-to-completion?
- [Bug 11656] New: niceECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScript ECMAScrip
- Re: clipboard events