- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 13:55:43 -0800
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: Dimitri Glazkov <dglazkov@chromium.org>, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "ext Klotz, Leigh" <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 1:51 PM, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Le 10/03/11 16:46, Cameron McCormack a écrit : > >> We should think of XBL as being a DOM-based thing, rather than an XML- >> based thing. Then we can have HTML syntax for the cases where >> everything is within a text/html document, and XML syntax for the cases >> like the ones I brought up, where you might be purely within an SVG >> document. > > I disagree. If you do that, the HTML serialization of a binding won't > be usable in a user agent having no knowledge of HTML. The HTML serialization of an ordinary web page isn't usable in a user agent having no knowledge of HTML, either. Why is this different? ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:56:38 UTC