Re: [widgets] Questions regarding to "Test Suite for the XML Digital Signatures For Widgets Specification "

On 1/31/11 8:18 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
>
>
> On 1/31/11 7:52 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
>> Andrey - on January 26, Marcos proposed changing the c14n algorithm in
>> [1] and [2] and notified the group in [3] that he updated the Editor's
>> Draft [ED] to reflect his proposal. He included rationale in [1].
>>
>> Marcos - in what way(s) does your proposal break the signer and
>> validator conformance classes as defined in the June 2010 CR [CR]?
>
> It would remove all references and dependencies on XML Canonicalization
> 1.1 in favor of XML Canonicalization 1.0. Explicit <tranform> to
> Canonicalization 1.1 would no longer be needed (XML Dig Sig just
> defaults to 1.0). Everything else stays the same.

Diff view:
http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2Fwidgets-digsig%2F&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2F2006%2Fwaf%2Fwidgets-digsig%2F



-- 
Marcos Caceres
Opera Software

Received on Monday, 31 January 2011 19:27:30 UTC