Arthur Barstow: > * Should the WG pursue Dimitri Glazkov's Component Model proposal > [Component]? If yes, who is willing to commit to work on that spec? I promised Dmitri some use cases from the SVG WG’s perspective, but haven’t managed to get to working on these yet. Whatever solution we have in the end – and I personally am not really fussed about whether it is XBL2 as it was, or is now, or something new based on Dmitri’s requirements document – I would like it to be able to work without an HTML document present. I want to be able to write a document like <svg …> <star cx="100" cy="100" points="5"/> </svg> or <svg …> <my:star xmlns:star="…" cx="100" cy="100" points="5"/> </svg> or <svg …> <g class="star" cx="100" cy="100" points="5"/> </svg> or <svg …> <g binding="star" cx="100" cy="100" points="5"/> </svg> (choosing <g> here because it’s kind of similar to a <div>), one of those. Sorry for not having more concrete comments yet. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/Received on Wednesday, 9 March 2011 21:26:09 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:16 UTC