- From: Drew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 13:24:32 -0800
- To: Alex Komoroske <komoroske@chromium.org>
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-webapps@w3.org
- Message-ID: <AANLkTinmWmY+hVUB1W71qSpST6WxqZNGnPTZQtVoi9-M@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Alex Komoroske <komoroske@chromium.org>wrote: > For clarity, I've included the current draft of the proposal below, which > incorporates the feedback from this thread. > > > **** > > There is currently no good way for a web page to detect that it is > completely invisible to the user (for example, that it is a background tab), > although some imperfect heuristics do exist. In the future, there may be > cases where such detection is even more important, for example in the > prerendering feature that Chromium is currently in the early stages of > experimentation with. > > > Use cases > > * A page wants to detect when it is being prerendered so it can behave > appropriately. > * A puzzle game has a timer that keeps track of how long the user has > taken to solve the puzzle. It wants to pause the timer when the user has > hidden the tab. > * A web app that uses polling to fetch dynamic content can pause polling > when it knows the page is hidden from the user. > * A streaming video site doesn’t want to start the video until the user > actually views the tab for the first time (i.e. video shouldn’t start > automatically if a user opens the tab in the background). > * An in-browser collaborative editing environment wants to update a user’s > status to away when the editing surface is not visible to the user. > * A web-based chat application wants to show the user notifications via > the Web Notification API when a message is received, but only when the page > is not visible to the user. > I wanted to point out that many of these use cases are covered adequately by document.focus()/document.blur(), which is what we currently use in Gmail to decide whether to mark the user as away, decide whether to display notifications, etc. In fact, I think the only two use cases that aren't already covered by the focus/blur notifications are: * Page wants to detect prerendering * Web app wants to stop updating when it's not visible. In the latter case, I actually don't think your current definition of visible ("is the focused tab in some browser window somewhere, even if that window is completely obscured by other windows") adequately addresses that use case (either the page would just hook focus/blur(), or it would really want to know if its actually visible to the user, rather than just being the topmost tab in a completely obscured window. So I think it's valuable to allow pages to detect prerendering/preview rendering, but I'm wondering if a more focused API would address that use case more concisely? -atw > > With these use-cases in mind, there are a number of requirements. > > > Requirements > > * Easy for developers to write scripts that fall back on old behaviors for > browsers that do not implement this API > * Ability to query the document’s current visibility state > * Events fired when the document transitions between visibility states > * Ability for browser vendors to add new visibility states in the future > > > API > > > document.visible > > Returns true if document.visibilityState’s current value is in the set of > visibility states considered to be visible (see the next section for > information on document.visibilityState). In practice document.visible is > merely a convenience property that is well-suited to simple uses. > > The “visible” state is considered to be visible in all implementations. > “hidden”, “prerender”, and “cache” are considered to be hidden in all > implementations. The visibility of additional values, including “preview”, > are up to the discretion of the implementation (for example, an > implementation that makes use of nearly-full-size thumbnail previews may > consider “preview” to be a visible state). > > > document.visibilityState > > A read-only property that returns a string, one of the values described in > the next section. Developers can use the existence of this property to know > that they can rely on the rest of this API, too. > * Values returned by all conforming implementations > * “visible” : the page content may be at least partially visible. > * “hidden” : the page content is not visible to the user at all. > * Additional values potentially returned by some implementations in some > cases > * “prerender” : the page is currently being loaded off-screen and might > never be shown to the user. > * “cache” : the page is currently “frozen” in a cache and not displayed > on screen (e.g. the back-forward cache). > * “preview” : the page is currently visible only in a lower-resolution > version. > > Visibility states considered to be visible, for the purposes of > document.visible, include “visible”. > > States in the second set are not guaranteed to be returned in all cases > where they might otherwise appear to apply--it is left to the discretion of > the implementation. > > Additional return values may be added to this API in the future. > > It is up to the implementation to interpret what these values mean in the > precise context of interface and platform. As an example, a > current-generation desktop browser might interpret the values the following > way: > “visible” : the tab is focused in its non-minimized window (regardless of > the focus state of the containing window). > “hidden” : the tab is backgrounded within its window, or the containing > window is minimized. > > > visibilitychange > > A simple event, fired at the document object immediately after > document.visibilityState transitions between visibility states. The event > has two properties, fromState and fromVisible, that are set to the value of > document.visibilityState and document.visible, respectively, just before > they were changed to the current value. The eventNote that visibility has > nothing to do with whether the document’s contents have fully loaded or not, > which implies that for any given visibility transition event, onload may or > may not have already fired. >
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 21:25:04 UTC