Re: [chromium-html5] LocalStorage inside Worker

On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote:
>> would:
>> withNamedStorage('x', function(store) {...});
>> make more sense from a naming point of view?
>
> I have a different association for 'with', especially in context of
> JavaScript, so I prefer 'get'. But others feel free to express an
> opinion.

In the context of other languages with similar constructs (request a
resource which is available within the body of the construct), the
"with[resource]" naming scheme is pretty common and well-known.  I
personally like it.

~TJ

Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 22:45:23 UTC