Re: CfC: publish a new Working Draft of DOM Core; comment deadline March 2

On Thu, 03 Mar 2011 12:54:08 +0100, Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>  
wrote:
> There is significant support for this CfC and in general, I tend to
> favor PEPO (publish early, publish often).
>
> However, in this case, the group already agreed D3E is feature complete
> and it would be suboptimal (some have suggested harmful), for WebApps to
> publish a spec that conflicts/overlaps with D3E. Additionally, some
> members have been working on D3E for a relatively long time and they
> naturally want to preserve their investment.
>
> Doug expressed [DS] willingness to change D3E (to align with DOM Core
> Events) if there is broad consensus for changes. In this spirit of
> cooperation, before a new WD of DOM Core is published, I think the next
> step is to do as Doug suggested and identify all D3E issues.
>
> Anne asked [AvK] about the mechanism to use to identify issues. Unless
> Doug suggests otherwise, I recommend using a separate thread per issue
> on the www-dom mail list.

I followed your suggestion:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-dom/2011JanMar/

I also addressed the concerns raised by Adrian. I and Ms2ger also added  
several people to the list of acknowledgments that we missed initially.  
Can we publish now? :-)


> [DS]  
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0687.html
> [AvK]
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011JanMar/0722.html


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/

Received on Friday, 4 March 2011 15:40:42 UTC