W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-webapps@w3.org > January to March 2011

Re: IndexedDB: updates through cursors on indexes that change the key

From: Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2011 00:48:27 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=GFpFP68LS7k7u=Rk=K7WcHfpe+wXkPeCON9A3@mail.gmail.com>
To: ben turner <bent.mozilla@gmail.com>
Cc: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>, public-webapps@w3.org, Jeremy Orlow <jorlow@chromium.org>, Hans Wennborg <hans@chromium.org>
Sorry, sent that before I was finished.

Seems prone to problems in environments with multiple parallel accesses to
the same database.

I guess I would need to do an atomic copy of the elements to a separate
object store to iterate throught? Is there a way of atomically copying a set
of objects?


On 2 Feb 2011 00:41, "Keean Schupke" <keean@fry-it.com> wrote:

That seems to be different from accepted practice in databases. I

> On 2 Feb 2011 00:39, "ben turner" <bent.mozilla@gmail.com> wrote:
> No, that idea was rejecte...

> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote:
> Surely the cursor should ...
Received on Wednesday, 2 February 2011 00:49:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:13:16 UTC