- From: Dean Landolt <dean@deanlandolt.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:49:33 -0500
- To: Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com>
- Cc: Joran Greef <joran@ronomon.com>, public-webapps@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2011 18:50:06 UTC
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Keean Schupke <keean@fry-it.com> wrote: > Actually I am not sure now if SQLite uses BDB now (they might be moving to > it though). However BDB definitely now has an SQLite-3.0 compatible API now > and supports better concurrency, as well as AES encryption. So at the moment > looks like i'm moving to using BDB instead of SQLite, (apart from when size > of the app package file is an issue and SQLite is provided as part of the > platform). Regardless, I think your point stands -- the indexes in SQLite no doubt look an awful lot like BDB btrees, which look an awful lot like IDB objectStores. This is a foundational API.
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2011 18:50:06 UTC