- From: Nathan Kitchen <w3c@nathankitchen.com>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2011 08:36:06 +0000
- To: Axel Rauschmayer <axel@rauschma.de>
- Cc: marcosc@opera.com, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTikUBCb-b+06tPkN9utFOqjOTL-0EWTDR71FYYXf@mail.gmail.com>
I'm also a little confused. There was a recent announcement [1] from the WHATWG that the version number was being dropped from HTML 5. This has been reported elsewhere, usually directly referring back to the WHATWG announcement [2]. Obviously this doesn't seem to fit with the smacking great "5" in the new logo. For the record I think it looks great, there just seems to be a bit of confusion around it at the moment. [1] http://blog.whatwg.org/html-is-the-new-html5 <http://blog.whatwg.org/html-is-the-new-html5>[2] http://arstechnica.com/web/news/2011/01/html-to-lose-the-version-number.ars On 23 January 2011 06:54, Axel Rauschmayer <axel@rauschma.de> wrote: > Yes, the logo looks awesome! > > But I think we should clarify who the logo is for: Techies or end users. > All the logo mission statements that I have read point to the former group, > but I think it makes more sense to target the latter group. Then HTML5 might > not be a good brand [1]. > > [1] > http://www.2ality.com/2011/01/branding-web-technologies-and-new-html5.html > > On Jan 23, 2011, at 4:49 , Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > Hi Philippe, > > > > Logos look nice! however, I'm baffled as to why HTML5 logo site mix in > > things like WebGL and CSS 3, which are clearly not part of the HTML > > Standard (as it is now known;))? Who made the choice of what > > technologes were to be included or excluded from the set of > > technologies that make up the logo sets? I ask because it's poignant > > and a little demoralizing to us who have been working for many years > > to see W3C Widgets excluded from the list. I'm sure I'm not the only > > one feeling a bit confused by the W3C's lack of communication about > > this project or why the W3C chose to exclude widgets and other > > technologies? Did I miss the memo? > > > > Kind regards, > > Marcos > > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > >> Dear Web Application Working Group, > >> > >> Today W3C introduced an HTML5 logo for public consideration: > >> http://www.w3.org/News/2011#entry-8992 > >> > >> The W3C Communications Team is excited about the HTML5 logo, developed > >> with community support, and hopes it will help you promote your work. > >> The logo is intended to be a general purpose visual identity for HTML5 > >> and other web application technologies. It doesn't imply conformance; > >> just "this is about open web application technologies." > >> > >> This is not yet the official W3C Communications Team logo for HTML5. We > >> look forward to broad community adoption in order to make it so. > >> > >> For more information about the logo, see the logo home page [1] and faq > >> [2]. > >> > >> Thank you, > >> > >> Philippe Le Hégaret, Interaction Domain Lead > >> > >> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/logo/ > >> [2] http://www.w3.org/html/logo/faq > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Marcos Caceres > > Opera Software ASA, http://www.opera.com/ > > http://datadriven.com.au > > > > > > -- > Dr. Axel Rauschmayer > axel@rauschma.de > Home: http://rauschma.de > Blog: http://2ality.com > > > > >
Received on Sunday, 23 January 2011 08:36:36 UTC